An expected utility maximizer walks into a bar...

We conducted field experiments at a bar to test whether blood alcohol concentration (BAC) correlates with violations of the generalized axiom of revealed preference (GARP) and the independence axiom. We found that individuals with BACs well above the legal limit for driving adhere to GARP and independence at rates similar to those who are sober. This finding led to the fielding of a third experiment to explore how risk preferences might vary as a function of BAC. We found gender-specific effects: Men did not exhibit variations in risk preferences across BACs. In contrast, women were more risk averse than men at low BACs but exhibited increasing tolerance towards risks as BAC increased. Based on our estimates, men and women’s risk preferences are predicted to be identical at BACs nearly twice the legal limit for driving. We discuss the implications for policy-makers.

[1]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[2]  S. Afriat.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS FROM EXPENDITURE DATA , 1967 .

[3]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  EFFECTS OF PROBLEM REPRESENTATION AND FEEDBACK ON RATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN ALLAIS AND MORLAT‐TYPE PROBLEMS , 1974 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[5]  J. Kagel,et al.  Marihuana and work performance: results from an experiment. , 1980, The Journal of human resources.

[6]  H. Varian.  The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis , 1982 .

[7]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  The Effects of Problem Representation on the Sure-Thing and Substitution Principles , 1985 .

[8]  Eddie Dekel.  An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom , 1986 .

[9]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  A Theory of Rational Addiction , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  J. Brick.  Intoxication Test Evidence: Criminal and Civil , 1989 .

[11]  C. Steele,et al.  Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[12]  George Wu.  An empirical test of ordinal independence , 1994 .

[13]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability , 1994 .

[14]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[15]  John D. Hey,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Errors in Decision Making under Risk Experimental investigations of errors in decision making under risk , 1995 .

[16]  Reinhard Sippel,et al.  An Experiment on the Pure Theory of Consumer'S Behaviour , 1997 .

[17]  K. Fromme,et al.  Effects of alcohol intoxication on the perceived consequences of risk taking. , 1997, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[18]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk , 1998 .

[19]  D. Prelec.  The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[20]  Alcohol myopia and condom use: can alcohol intoxication be associated with more prudent behavior? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[22]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Garp for kids: On the development of rational choice behavior , 2001 .

[23]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[24]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[25]  Harmful Addiction† , 2003 .

[26]  Luis C. Corchón,et al.  Addiction and Cue-Triggered Decision Processes. , 2004, The American economic review.

[27]  Scott D. Lane,et al.  Alcohol effects on human risk taking , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[28]  Jerrold S. Meyer,et al.  Psychopharmacology: Drugs, the Brain, and Behavior , 2004 .

[29]  A. Redish,et al.  Addiction as a Computational Process Gone Awry , 2004, Science.

[30]  Jess Benhabib,et al.  Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[31]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: New Data without Order Effects , 2005 .

[32]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  A Dual Self Model of Impulse Control , 2004, The American economic review.

[33]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Viewpoint: On the Generalizability of Lab Behaviour to the Field , 2007 .

[34]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Consistency, Heterogeneity, and Granularity of Individual Behavior under Uncertainty , 2007 .

[35]  Syngjoo Choi,et al.  Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty , 2007 .

[36]  S. Lane,et al.  Modulation of human risky decision making by flunitrazepam , 2008, Psychopharmacology.

[37]  F. Bloom,et al.  Introduction to Neuropsychopharmacology , 2008 .

[38]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Dopamine, Reward Prediction Error, and Economics , 2008 .

[39]  Adam Johnson,et al.  Computing motivation: Incentive salience boosts of drug or appetite states , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[41]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain , 2008 .

[42]  James C. Cox,et al.  Risk aversion in experiments , 2008 .

[43]  B. Wollschlaeger.  Paying the Tab: The Costs and Benefits of Alcohol Control , 2008 .

[44]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[45]  Nora D Volkow,et al.  Neurocircuitry of Addiction , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[46]  E. Owens,et al.  One for the Road: Public Transportation, Alcohol Consumption, and Intoxicated Driving , 2010 .

[47]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List , 2011 .

[48]  J. Kable,et al.  Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Disrupts Value Maximization in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.