Top‐Down Effects in a Tritrophic System: Parasitoids Enhance Plant Fitness

We determined the direct and indirect top—down forces in a tritrophic system composed of a guild of three parasitoid species (Necremnus tidius, N. folia, and Aprostocestus sp.), a single weevil seed—predator species (Ceutorhynchus sp. nov.), and the host plant, Hormathophylla spinosa, a woody crucifer of the high—mountain elevations of the Sierra Nevada (southeast Spain). By Means of observational and experimental approaches, we focused on the possible regulatory effects of parasitoids on the weevil population as well as on the analysis of the sign and strength of the resulting indirect effects on plant fitness. Weevill attacks 21.7% of the fruit produced by H. spinosa during the study, selecting fruits having the most seeds. Seeds eaten by weevils were significantly bigger than uneaten ones. The number of seeds per fruit after being depredated by Ceutorhynchus was significantly smaller than for fruit not attacked. Thus, weevils affect the fitness of the host plant both by decreasing the number of seeds (quantitative effect) and by reducing the average size of surviving seeds per fruit (qualitative effect). When parasitoids were excluded experimentally, the percentage of attacked fruit (which corresponds to the number of weevil larvae) rose from 20 to 43%. We assume that the increase in the experimental weevil population may be because excluding parasitoids eliminates not only death by parasitoid oviposition for some Ceutorhynchus larvae, but also death by direct predation of parasitoids on weevil larvae. We have also experimentally verified that parasitoid activity benefits the entire plant, by way of parasitoids contributing to a higher average number of seeds dispersed per fruit in each plant, by influencing both the abundance of the weevis and the behavior of the weevil larvae.

[1]  B. A. Hawkins,et al.  Parasitoid-Host Food Webs and Donor Control , 1992 .

[2]  Bruce A. McPheron,et al.  Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels: Influence of Plants on Interactions Between Insect Herbivores and Natural Enemies , 1980 .

[3]  M. Hunter,et al.  Playing Chutes and Ladders: Heterogeneity and the Relative Roles of Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Forces in Natural Communities , 1992, Ecology.

[4]  D. Haig,et al.  Inclusive fitness, seed resources, and maternal care. , 1988 .

[5]  P. Stiling The Frequency of Density Dependence in Insect Host‐Parasitoid Systems , 1987 .

[6]  Timothy P. Craig,et al.  The window of vulnerability of a shoot-galling sawfly to attack by a parasitoid. , 1990 .

[7]  S. D. Hendrix Herbivory and its Impact on Plant Reporduction , 1988 .

[8]  N. Cappuccino Adjacent trophic‐level effects on spatial density dependence in a herbivore—predator—parasitoid system , 1992 .

[9]  L. Rothman,et al.  Spatial density dependence: effects of scale, host spatial pattern and parasitoid reproductive strategy. , 1991 .

[10]  W. Abrahamson,et al.  Energetics of the Solidago Canadensis‐stem Gall Insect‐parasitoid Guild Interaction , 1979 .

[11]  S. Strauss,et al.  Indirect effects in community ecology: Their definition, study and importance. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  T. Tscharntke Coexistence, tritrophic interactions and density dependence in a species-rich parasitoid community , 1992 .

[13]  C. M. Lessells Parasitoid foraging: should parasitism be density dependent? , 1985 .

[14]  E. Simms,et al.  Effects of plant variation on herbivore-natural enemy interactions. , 1992 .

[15]  G. Vaughton Predation by Insects Limits Seed Production in Banksia spinulosa var. neoanglica (Proteaceae) , 1990 .

[16]  K. Clancy,et al.  Temporal variation in three-trophic-level interactions among willows, sawflies, and parasites , 1986 .

[17]  E. Simms,et al.  Botanical Defenses. (Book Reviews: Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens. Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics.) , 1992 .

[18]  K. Clancy,et al.  Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels: Gall size and Parasitoid Attack , 1986 .

[19]  Lonnie W. Aarssen,et al.  The effect of genetically based differences in seed size on seedling survival in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) , 1991 .

[20]  S. Faeth Host Leaf Selection by Leaf Miners: Interactions among Three Trophic Levels , 1985 .

[21]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Food Webs From the Small to the Large: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 1989 .

[22]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[23]  M. Power,et al.  TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES IN FOOD WEBS: DO PLANTS HAVE PRIMACY? , 1992 .

[24]  R. Zamora,et al.  Vertebrate herbivores as predators of insect herbivores : an asymmetrical interaction mediated by size differences , 1993 .

[25]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  The Ecological Web: More on the Distribution and Abundance of Animals , 1984 .

[26]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS' , 1992 .

[27]  D. Strong,et al.  Does Spatial Scale Affect the Incidence of Density Dependence? A Field Test with Insect Parasitoids , 1991 .

[28]  T. Auld,et al.  Population dynamics of the shrub Acacia suaveolens (Sm.) Willd.: Seed production and predispersal seed predation , 1986 .