User Content Generation and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet: An Empirical Analysis

We quantify how user mobile Internet usage relates to unique characteristics of the mobile Internet. In particular, we focus on examining how the mobile-phone based content generation behavior of users relates to content usage behavior. The key objective is to analyze whether there is a positive or negative interdependence between the two activities. We use a unique panel dataset that consists of individual-level mobile Internet usage data that encompasses individual multimedia content generation and usage behavior. We combine this knowledge with data on user calling patterns, such as duration, frequency, and locations from where calls are placed to construct their social network and to compute their geographical mobility. We build an individual-level simultaneous equation panel data model that controls for the different sources of endogeneity of the social network. We find that there is a negative and statistically significant temporal interdependence between content generation and usage. This finding implies that an increase in content usage in the previous period has a negative impact on content generation in the current period and vice versa. The marginal effect of this interdependence is stronger on content usage (up to 8.7%) than on content generation (up to 4.3%). The extent of geographical mobility of users has a positive effect on their mobile Internet activities. Users more frequently engage in content usage compared to content generation when they are traveling. In addition, the variance of user mobility has a stronger impact on their mobile Internet activities than does the mean. We also find that the social network has a strong positive effect on user behavior in the mobile Internet. These analyses unpack the mechanisms that stimulate user behavior on the mobile Internet. Implications for shaping user mobile Internet usage behavior are discussed.

[1]  Marc L. Nerlove,et al.  Experimental Evidence on the Estimation of Dynamic Economic Relations from a Time Series of Cross-Se , 1967 .

[2]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Asymmetric Social Interactions in Physician Prescription Behavior: The Role of Opinion Leaders , 2008 .

[3]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications , 2008 .

[4]  Yong Tan,et al.  Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  John Morgan,et al.  Clicks, Discontinuities, and Firm Demand Online , 2006 .

[6]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Consuming video on mobile devices , 2007, CHI.

[7]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Time and Consumer Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Overview , 1976 .

[8]  Mark B. Stewart,et al.  Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of Random-Effects Dynamic Probit Models with Autocorrelated Errors , 2006 .

[9]  Sang Pil Han,et al.  A Dynamic Structural Model of User Learning on the Mobile Internet , 2011 .

[10]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[11]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[12]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  ON THE ESTIMATION OF TRIANGULAR STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS , 1978 .

[13]  Jung P. Shim,et al.  Mobile TV phone: current usage, issues, and strategic implications , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  The Persistence of Marketing Effects on Sales , 1995 .

[15]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[17]  Matthew Osborne,et al.  Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination , 2007 .

[18]  Ying Xie,et al.  The Role of Targeted Communication and Contagion in Product Adoption , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[19]  W. Greene,et al.  Fixed and Random Effects Models for Count Data , 2007 .

[20]  Chris Volinsky,et al.  Network-Based Marketing: Identifying Likely Adopters Via Consumer Networks , 2006, math/0606278.

[21]  Kay-Yut Chen,et al.  Evaluating Promotional Activities in an Online Two-Sided Market of User-Generated Content , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[22]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  Identifying Formal and Informal Influence in Technology Adoption with Network Externalities , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[23]  T. Lancaster.  The incidental parameter problem since 1948 , 2000 .

[24]  M. Arellano,et al.  Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-Groups Estimators , 2009 .

[25]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[26]  Patrick Sevestre,et al.  The Econometrics of panel data : a handbook of the theory with applications , 1996 .

[27]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  The Emergence of Market Structure in New Repeat-Purchase Categories: The Interplay of Market Share and Retailer Distribution , 2000 .

[28]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Jeffrey E. Zabel.  Estimating fixed and random effects models with selectivity , 1992 .

[31]  Sougata Mukherjea,et al.  Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks , 2008, EDBT '08.

[32]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[34]  Christopher F. Baum.  CHECKREG3: Stata module to check identification status of simultaneous equations system , 2007 .

[35]  M. Stewart.  The Inter-related Dynamics of Unemployment and Low-wage Employment , 2007 .

[36]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  The Effect of Signal Quality and Contiguous Word of Mouth on Customer Acquisition for a Video-on-Demand Service , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[37]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  On the estimation of a fixed effects model with selectivity bias , 1990 .

[38]  Patrick A. Puhani,et al.  The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique - A Short Survey , 2000 .

[39]  Y. Mundlak.  On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data , 1978 .