Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the ‘daylighting’ and restoration of culverted rivers

We review published references on ‘deculverting’ (also known as ‘daylighting’) projects in the United Kingdom and internationally. The aim of the review was to assess the objectives of implemented projects and to establish where evidence exists for the purported social, economic and environmental benefits of deculverting. The outcomes highlight the need for collaboration to collate detailed information on such projects, to support the further development of evidence-based policy. It is clear that deculverting schemes can indeed exert considerable positive impacts, including ecological benefits, reduced flood risks, recreation for local communities and a stimulus for regeneration, but that the evidence for these impacts is sparse. We conclude that improvements in policy will help to maximise these opportunities, by encouraging the implementation of good practices.

[1]  Karen D. Holl,et al.  Paying for Restoration , 2000 .

[2]  R. Hey,et al.  The effect of instream rehabilitation structures on macroinvertebrates in lowland rivers , 2004 .

[3]  Noelwah R. Netusil,et al.  Economic Valuation of Riparian Corridors and Upland Wildlife Habitat in an Urban Watershed , 2009 .

[4]  M. Palmer,et al.  Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[5]  Sally Eden,et al.  Ecological versus Social Restoration? How Urban River Restoration Challenges but Also Fails to Challenge the Science – Policy Nexus in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[6]  M. Taylor,et al.  Why rehabilitate urban river systems , 2006 .

[7]  Jong-Ho Shin,et al.  Cheong Gye Cheon restoration in Seoul, Korea , 2006 .

[8]  Response of the fish populations of the River Don in South Yorkshire to water quality and habitat improvements. , 2000, Environmental pollution.

[9]  Matthias Buchecker,et al.  Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations , 2008 .

[10]  Robert Cervero,et al.  From Elevated Freeway to Urban Greenway: Land Value Impacts of the CGC Project in Seoul, Korea , 2009 .

[11]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts , 2005, Science.

[12]  P. Davies,et al.  Improving the upstream passage of two galaxiid fish species through a pipe culvert , 2007 .

[13]  Stefan Brunzel,et al.  Effects of re‐braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic invertebrates in mountain rivers , 2009 .