Verification of the Vertical Error in C-Band SRTM DEM Using ICESat and Landsat-7, Otter Tail County, MN

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) provided scientists with digital elevation data on a nearly global scale and with highly consistent accuracy. This paper compares elevation values of the C-band SRTM 30-m digital elevation model (DEM) with pointwise elevations from the Ice, Cloud, and land-Elevation Satellite (ICESat) laser altimetry for Otter Tail County, Minnesota. The accuracy of SRTM DEM is measured as a function of land covers and geomorphologic characteristics. The typical mean vertical difference between the SRTM DEM and ICESat elevations in this paper was determined in each classified land-use type and is approximately 1.5 m over bare ground, with the SRTM measuring lower elevations. Significant changes in the SRTM DEM uncertainties have been identified over different surface types classified from Landsat-7 imagery, e.g., bare ground, urban, and forested areas. Based on this result, the difference of the SRTM 30-m DEM and ICESat elevations has been removed from the DEM and made available for improved hydrological applications

[1]  M. R. Inggs,et al.  Preliminary assessment of SRTM X band DEMs of Southern Africa for hydrogeological studies , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[2]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of the ICESat Mission , 2005 .

[3]  John D. Vona,et al.  Vegetation height estimation from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission and National Elevation Datasets , 2004 .

[4]  A. Roth,et al.  The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar , 2003 .

[5]  Richard Bamler,et al.  The SRTM Mission - A World-Wide 30 m Resolution DEM from SAR Interferometry in 11 Days , 1999 .

[6]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  Calibration and validation of the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission height data for southeastern Michigan , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[7]  M. Eineder,et al.  PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS FOR INSAR DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL GENERATION OF MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN , 2004 .

[8]  William B. Krabill,et al.  ICESat range and mounting bias estimation over precisely‐surveyed terrain , 2005 .

[9]  H. Zwally.  ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice and Atmospheres , 2003 .

[10]  S. Hensley,et al.  SRTM-Mission - cross comparison of X and C band data properties , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[11]  Zhong Lu,et al.  Digital elevation model of King Edward VII Peninsula, West Antarctica, from SAR interferometry and ICESat laser altimetry , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[13]  Dan Johan Weydahl,et al.  Analysis of X-SAR SRTM elevation data to estimate surface cover heights over land areas , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[14]  C. K. Shum,et al.  ICESat Laser Altimetry in the Great Lakes , 2004 .

[15]  C. Werner,et al.  Satellite radar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrapping , 1988 .

[16]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  A New Supervised Absolute Classifier , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  F. K. Becker,et al.  Automatic equalization for digital communication , 1965 .

[18]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat validation of SRTM C‐band digital elevation models , 2004 .

[19]  Jürgen Holzner,et al.  Interferometric DEMs in alpine terrain-limits and options for ERS and SRTM , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).