Use of faeces as an alternative inoculum to caecal content to study in vitro feed digestibility in domesticated ostriches ( Struthio camelus var. domesticus )

1. In order to find an alternative source of inoculum to caecal content for studying the in vitro feed digestibility in domesticated ostriches (Struthio camelus var. domesticus), caecal content and faeces of 4 male birds were used as inocula for an in vitro gas production trial. 2. About 1 g of each of 5 substrates (maize silage, CS; alfalfa hay, AH; barley, BG; soybean meal, SM; beet pulp, BP) was weighed, in quadruplicate per inoculum, in 120 ml flasks; 75 ml of anaerobic medium and 4 ml of reducing solution were added and flasks were kept at 39°C. Caecal content and faeces were diluted respectively 1 : 2 (CI) and 1 : 4 (FI) with an anaerobic medium and were injected into the respective flasks (10 ml). 3. Gas production was recorded 22 times up to 120 h of incubation and fermentation characteristics (for instance, degraded organic matter, OMd; potential gas production, A; maximum fermentation rate, R max; time at which it is reached, T max; pH; volatile fatty acid, VFA; ammonia) were studied for each inoculum and substrate. 4. CI and FI showed significant differences in T max (16·37 vs 18·47 h, respectively), propionic (16·47 vs 12·07 mmoles/l) and butyric acid (6·50 vs 7·98 mmoles/l) and ammonia concentration (17·18 vs 19·95 mmoles/l). The substrates, according to their chemical composition, showed different fermentation characteristics. However, the regression equations able to estimate some fermentation characteristics of the caecum from those of faeces were statistically significant and showed R 2-values ranging from 0·87 to 0·99. 5. The differences in fermentation pathways of the two inocula did not appear to influence the rate and extent of OM digestion. Faecal fermentation predicted rates and extent of OM digestion by caecal fermentation in ostriches; consequently, the faeces could be considered as an alternative to caecal content to study feed digestibility in the species, although there is a need to undertake further research.

[1]  S. Calabrò,et al.  Comparison of Rabbit Caecal Content and Rabbit Hard Faeces as Source of Inoculum for the In vitro Gas Production Technique , 2006 .

[2]  G. Piccolo,et al.  Effect of inoculum from suckling rabbits of different ages on fermentation parameters obtained with the in vitro gas production technique. , 2006 .

[3]  C. Nhetaa,et al.  In vitro digestibility using caecal liquor of diets containing poor quality roughages and green forages fed to domesticated ostriches ( Struthio camelus var . domesticus ) , 2005 .

[4]  F. Delpino.  PREDICTION OF NUTRITIVE VALUE OF DIETS FOR RABBITS USING AN IN VITRO GAS PRODUCTION TECHNIQUE , 2003 .

[5]  S. Calabrò,et al.  In vitro degradability of three forages: fermentation kinetics and gas production of NDF and neutral detergent soluble fraction of forages , 2002 .

[6]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Microbial activities of faeces from unweaned and adult pigs, in relation to selected fermentable carbohydrates , 2001 .

[7]  D. K. Lovett,et al.  Faeces as a source of microbial enzymes for estimating digestibility. , 2000 .

[8]  M. Bosch,et al.  Effects of Addition of Fructooligosaccharide (FOS) and Sugar Beet Pulp to Weanling Pig Diets on Performance, Microflora and Intestinal Health , 1999 .

[9]  Michael Blümmel,et al.  In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review , 1998 .

[10]  K. Becker,et al.  The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake , 1997, British Journal of Nutrition.

[11]  J. P. Hayes,et al.  A comparative study between mature ostriches (Struthio camelus) and adult cockerels with respect to true and apparent metabolisable energy values for maize, barley, oats and triticale. , 1997, British poultry science.

[12]  J. Groot,et al.  Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds , 1996 .

[13]  M. Theodorou,et al.  Repeatability of in vitro digestibility assays of forages when using fresh, frozen or freeze-dried cow faeces instead of sheep rumen liquor as sources of micro-organisms , 1995, Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science.

[14]  M. Theodorou,et al.  A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. , 1994 .

[15]  E. Ørskov,et al.  Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle , 1993 .

[16]  M. Theodorou.  A new laboratory procedure for determining the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds , 1993 .

[17]  Kenneth Helrick,et al.  Official methods of analysis , 1990 .

[18]  Kh Menke,et al.  Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid , 1988 .

[19]  R. Colwell,et al.  Metabolic activity of bacterial cells enumerated by direct viable count , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  R. Axford,et al.  Use of faecal organisms from sheep for the in vitro determination of digestibility , 1987, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[21]  P. L. Searle.  The berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen. A review , 1984 .

[22]  W. Horwitz.  Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[23]  J. M. A. Tilley,et al.  A TWO-STAGE TECHNIQUE FOR THE IN VITRO DIGESTION OF FORAGE CROPS , 1963 .