Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of metallic implant positioning on MR imaging artifacts, to determine the optimal imaging conditions for minimizing artifacts, and to show the usefulness of artifact-minimizing methods in imaging of the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using MR images of experimental phantoms (titanium alloy and stainless steel screws), we compared the magnitude of metal-induced artifacts for various pulse sequences, different imaging parameters for the fast spin-echo sequence, and different imaging parameters for several incremental angles between the long axis of the screw and the direction of the main magnetic field. In clinical MR imaging of knees with metallic implants (n = 19), we assessed geometric distortion of anatomic structures to compare the influence of different pulse sequences (n = 19), frequency-encoding directions (n = 7), and knee positions (n = 15). RESULTS Titanium alloy screws consistently produced smaller artifacts than did stainless steel screws. In experimental MR studies, artifacts were reduced with fast spin-echo sequences, with a screw orientation as closely parallel to the main magnetic field as possible, and, particularly, with smaller voxels that correlated positively with artifact size (R2 = .88, p < .01). In clinical MR studies, fast spin-echo MR imaging obscured articular structures less than did spin-echo imaging (8/19 patients). In particular, the anterior-posterior frequency-encoding direction (3/7 patients) and the flexion position of the knee (5/15 patients) were effective in reducing artifacts. CONCLUSION MR artifacts can be minimized by optimally positioning in the magnet subjects with metallic implants and by choosing fast spin-echo sequences with an anterior-posterior frequency-encoding direction and the smallest voxel size.

[1]  S. Wang,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging: a modified FS 3D SPGR technique for assessment of patellofemoral joint chondromalacia. , 1999, Clinical imaging.

[2]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[3]  M A Moerland,et al.  Analysis of machine-dependent and object-induced geometric distortion in 2DFT MR imaging. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Evaluation of the susceptibility effect on the phase images of a simple gradient echo. , 1990, Radiology.

[5]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Spine With Metal Implants|General Safety and Superior Imaging With Titanium , 1993, Spine.

[6]  S. Arridge,et al.  Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D. Meier,et al.  MR Imaging of Large Nonferromagnetic Metallic Implants at 1.5 T , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  M. Schnall,et al.  Conventional and fast spin‐echo MR imaging: Minimizing echo time , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M. C. Han,et al.  Perforation complicating balloon dilation of esophageal strictures in infants and children. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  S. Vinitski,et al.  Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[11]  M. Moerland,et al.  Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.