Integrated Quality of Models and Quality of Maps

Conceptual modeling traditionally focuses on a high level of abstraction. Even if geographical aspects such as location is included in several enterprise modeling frameworks [26], it is not common to have geographical aspects included in conceptual models. Cartography is the science of visualizing geographical information in maps. Traditionally the field has not included conceptual relationships and the primary focus is on a fairly low abstraction level. Both cartography and conceptual modeling have developed guidelines for obtaining high quality visualizations. SEQUAL is a quality framework developed for understanding quality in conceptual models and modeling languages. In cartography such counterparts are not common to find. An attempt to adapt SEQUAL in the context of cartographic maps has been performed, named MAPQUAL. The paper presents MAPQUAL. Differences between quality of maps and quality of conceptual models are highlighted, pointing to guidelines for combined representations which are the current focus of our work. An example of such combined use is presented indicating the usefulness of a combined framework.

[1]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[2]  John Krogstie,et al.  Active knowledge modeling of enterprises , 2008 .

[3]  A. Robinson Elements of Cartography , 1953 .

[4]  Martin Hepp,et al.  An Ontology Framework for Semantic Business Process Management , 2007, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[5]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge–Wand–Weber Model , 2002, Software and Systems Modeling.

[6]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[7]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Peter P. Chen The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, VLDB '75.

[9]  Chris Gane,et al.  Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques , 1977 .

[10]  Kendall Scott,et al.  UML distilled - applying the standard object modeling language , 1997 .

[11]  Ramez Elmasri,et al.  Entity-Relationship Approach — ER '93 , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  What Makes a Good Data Model? Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1994, ER.

[13]  D. Wood How Maps Work , 1992 .

[14]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Mobility Work: The Spatial Dimension of Collaboration at a Hospital , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  George Buchanan,et al.  An Evaluation of WebTwig - A Site Outliner for Handheld Web Access , 1999, HUC.

[16]  Georg Gartner,et al.  Towards Ubiquitous Cartography , 2007 .

[17]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  AwareMedia: a shared interactive display supporting social, temporal, and spatial awareness in surgery , 2006, CSCW '06.

[18]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[19]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  A process modelling success model: insights from a case study , 2003, ECIS.

[20]  D. L. Gorlée Handbook of Semiotics , 1997, English and American Studies in German.

[21]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UMLFamily of Diagrams , 2009, SLE.

[22]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps , 2010 .

[24]  Joseph F. McCarthy,et al.  ACTIVE MAP: A Visualization Tool for Location Awareness to Support Informal Interactions , 1999, HUC.

[25]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-geographic Information Visualization , 2003 .

[26]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification , 1993, [1993] Proceedings First International Software Metrics Symposium.