Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

This article is concerned with the detection of mixed modulation (MM), i.e., simultaneously occurring amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). In experiment 1, an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice task was used to determine thresholds for detecting AM alone. Then, thresholds for detecting FM were determined for stimuli which had a fixed amount of AM in the signal interval only. The amount of AM was always less than the threshold for detecting AM alone. The FM thresholds depended significantly on the magnitude of the coexisting AM. For low modulation rates (4, 16, and 64 Hz), the FM thresholds did not depend significantly on the relative phase of modulation for the FM and AM. For a high modulation rate (256 Hz) strong effects of modulator phase were observed. These phase effects are as predicted by the model proposed by Hartmann and Hnath [Acustica 50, 297-312 (1982)], which assumes that detection of modulation at modulation frequencies higher than the critical modulation frequency is based on detection of the lower sideband in the modulated signal's spectrum. In the second experiment, psychometric functions were measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using modulation rates of 4 and 16 Hz. Results showed that, for each type of modulation, d' is approximately a linear function of the square of the modulation index. Application of this finding to the results of experiment 1 suggested that, at low modulation rates, FM and AM are not detected by completely independent mechanisms. In the third experiment, psychometric functions were again measured for the detection of AM alone and FM alone, using a 10-Hz modulation rate. Detectability was then measured for combined AM and FM, with modulation depths selected so that each type of modulation would be equally detectable if presented alone. Significant effects of relative modulator phase were found when detectability was relatively high. These effects were not correctly predicted by either a single-band excitation-pattern model or a multiple-band excitation-pattern model. However, the detectability of the combined AM and FM was better than would be predicted if the two types of modulation were coded completely independently.

[1]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Psychometric Functions for the Discrimination of Differences in Intensity of Gaussian Noise , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  So,et al.  An excitation‐pattern model for intensity discrimination , 1981 .

[5]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Sęk,et al.  Perception of amplitude and frequency modulated signals (mixed modulation). , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  S. S. Stevens.  Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. , 1972 .

[8]  S. Sheft,et al.  Detection and recognition of amplitude modulation with tonal carriers , 1989 .

[9]  J. L. Goldstein.  Auditory spectral filtering and monaural phase perception. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[11]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Direct Comparisons between the Sensations Produced by Frequency Modulation and Amplitude Modulation , 1962 .

[12]  S. Kemp,et al.  Roughness of frequency-modulated tones , 1982 .

[13]  William M. Hartmann,et al.  Detection of mixed modulation , 1980 .

[14]  D. Maiwald,et al.  Ein Funktionsschema des Gehors zur Beschreibung der Erkennbarkeit kleiner Frequenz und Amplitudenanderungen , 1967 .

[15]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[16]  E Schorer,et al.  Critical modulation frequency based on detection of AM versus FM tones. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C D Creelman,et al.  PEST reduces bias in forced choice psychophysics. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. T. Allanson,et al.  Subjective responses to tones modulated simultaneously in both amplitude and frequency , 1966 .

[19]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the frequency discrimination of pulsed tones and the detection of frequency modulation , 1989 .

[20]  B C Moore,et al.  The temporal course of masking and the auditory filter shape. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.

[22]  E. Terhardt.  On the perception of periodic sound fluctuations (roughness) , 1974 .

[23]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.