High stakes assessments in primary schools and teachers’ anxiety about work

High-stakes assessments – where the results have important consequences for teachers, pupils and/or schools – are a common feature of many education systems across the world. One argument often made against their use, however, is that they have a negative impact on welling across the education sector. This includes those teachers who hold most responsibility for the results. We present new evidence on this matter by examining how the Year 6 Statutory Assessment Tests (SATs) conducted in England’s primary schools are linked to how anxious teachers feel about work. Drawing on unique panel data from around 1,000 primary school teachers, we illustrate how the SATs are associated with a short, sharp shock to teachers’ anxiety levels during the week the tests take place. Yet there is little evidence that those most exposed to the pressures of SATs suffer from especially prolonged periods of high anxiety levels. We thus conclude that, although there may be other reasons to lower the stakes attached to primary school assessments, the benefits for teachers’ anxiety levels are likely to be marginal.

[1]  John Jerrim National tests and the wellbeing of primary school pupils: new evidence from the UK , 2021, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice.

[2]  John Jerrim,et al.  When is high workload bad for teacher wellbeing? Accounting for the non-linear contribution of specific teaching tasks , 2021 .

[3]  Cennet Gologlu Demir,et al.  The impact of high-stakes testing on the teaching and learning processes of mathematics , 2021, Journal of Pedagogical Research.

[4]  William C. Smith,et al.  School testing culture and teacher satisfaction , 2020, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.

[5]  A. Hargreaves Large-scale assessments and their effects: The case of mid-stakes tests in Ontario , 2020, Journal of Educational Change.

[6]  Jane Perryman,et al.  WHAT MOTIVATES PEOPLE TO TEACH, AND WHY DO THEY LEAVE? ACCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMATIVITY AND TEACHER RETENTION , 2020, British Journal of Educational Studies.

[7]  J. Horton,et al.  ‘The show must go on!’ Fieldwork, mental health and wellbeing in Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences , 2019 .

[8]  Damien Page Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers , 2017 .

[9]  B. Grigsby,et al.  The influence of high-stakes testing on teacher self-efficacy and job-related stress , 2017 .

[10]  S. Gewirtz,et al.  A Curriculum for All?: The effects of recent Key Stage 4 curriculum, assessment and accountability reforms on English secondary education , 2016 .

[11]  K. Schonert-Reichl,et al.  Stress contagion in the classroom? The link between classroom teacher burnout and morning cortisol in elementary school students. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[12]  Majedah Abu Al-Rub,et al.  Teachers? Perceptions of High-Stakes Testing , 2016 .

[13]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Rational responses to high stakes testing: the case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows , 2011 .

[14]  J. Rasbash,et al.  School, family, neighbourhood: which is most important to a child's education? , 2010 .

[15]  J. Supovitz Can high stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform , 2009 .

[16]  Christin Lotz,et al.  Does test anxiety increase as the exam draws near? – Students' state test anxiety recorded over the course of one semester , 2017 .

[17]  Lantry L. Brockmeier,et al.  Teachers’ Beliefs about the Effects of High Stakes Testing , 2014 .

[18]  A. Saminsky High-Stakes Standardized Testing: A Panacea or a Pest? , 2011 .