Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension

Building on the multidimensional framework of epistemic cognition proposed by Greene et al. (Educational Psychologist 43:142–160, 2008), this study examined beliefs about justification of knowledge claims in science among 65 Norwegian 10th graders. The first research question asked whether beliefs in personal justification, justification by authority, and justification by multiple sources differed in strength among the participants. It was found that the students most strongly believed in justification by authority, followed by justification by multiple sources and personal justification. The second research question asked whether the three types of justification beliefs differentially and uniquely predicted the comprehension of multiple conflicting documents on a science issue. In a multiple regression analysis with multiple-documents comprehension indicated by essay performance as the dependent variable, both personal justification and justification by multiple sources emerged as unique predictors when topic knowledge was controlled for. Specifically, beliefs in personal opinion as a means of justifying knowledge claims in science was negatively related to multiple-documents comprehension, whereas beliefs in justification through corroboration across multiple sources of information were positively related to multiple-documents comprehension. This study provides new evidence about relationships between epistemic beliefs and new literacy competencies needed in an information society, such as integrating across multiple conflicting sources of information; relationships that may also have practical implications.

[1]  Susan E. Israel,et al.  Handbook of research on reading comprehension , 2009 .

[2]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Knowledge and Epistemological Beliefs: An Intimate but Complicate Relationship , 2008 .

[3]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others , 2010 .

[4]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts , 2008 .

[5]  M. Limón.  The domain generality–specificity of epistemological beliefs: A theoretical problem, a methodological problem or both? , 2006 .

[6]  Michael B. W. Wolfe,et al.  Relations Between Adolescents' Text Processing and Reasoning , 2005 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[8]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[9]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Modeling Epistemic and Ontological Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives and Methodological Directions , 2008 .

[10]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts , 2011 .

[11]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Conclusion , 2010 .

[12]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Self-regulated learning with hypermedia : The role of prior domain knowledge , 2008 .

[13]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Toward a theory of documents representation. , 1999 .

[14]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[15]  Steven A. Stahl.  What Happens When Students Read Multiple Source Documents in History? Reading Research Report No. 45. , 1996 .

[16]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Effects of Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts , 2006 .

[17]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility , 2007 .

[18]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Cognitive flexibility theory : advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains , 1988 .

[19]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Hypermedia: functional features and research issues , 1991 .

[20]  Susan E. Israel,et al.  Identifying and Describing Constructively Responsive Comprehension Strategies in New and Traditional Forms of Reading , 2014 .

[21]  H. Bayram,et al.  A Structural Model of Prospective Science Teachers' Nature of Science Views , 2010 .

[22]  Luke A. Buckland,et al.  Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology , 2011 .

[23]  J. Miles,et al.  Applying regression & correlation : a guide for students and researchers , 2001 .

[24]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change , 2011 .

[25]  Richard J. Paxton.  The Influence of Author Visibility on High School Students Solving a Historical Problem , 2002 .

[26]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[27]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Persuasion As a Dynamic, Multidimensional Process: An Investigation of Individual and Intraindividual Differences , 2004 .

[28]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Epistemic Cognition when Students Read Multiple Documents Containing Conflicting Scientific Evidence: A Think-Aloud Study. , 2012 .

[29]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. , 1996 .

[30]  Harry Singer,et al.  Theoretical models and processes of reading , 1976 .

[31]  J. Rouet,et al.  The Impact of Presentation Format, Task Assignment, and Prior Knowledge on Students' Comprehension of Multiple Online Documents , 2007 .

[32]  Hsin Ning Jessie Ho,et al.  Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students , 2011 .

[33]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs , 2007 .

[34]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[35]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Predicting global and topic-specific certainty beliefs: domain-specificity and the role of the academic environment. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[36]  P. Alexander,et al.  Motivation and Performance Differences in Students’ Domain-Specific Epistemological Belief Profiles , 2005 .

[37]  P. K. Murphy,et al.  Changing Knowledge and Beliefs , 2006 .

[38]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Effects of Beliefs about Meaning Construction and Task Instructions on Interpretation of Narrative Text. , 2006 .

[39]  M. Daneman,et al.  Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories for text. , 1996 .

[40]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  E. Stahl,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext , 2008 .

[42]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The development of scientific thinking skills , 1988 .

[43]  Nicola Ariasi,et al.  Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning , 2011 .

[44]  Myint Swe Khine,et al.  Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures , 2007 .

[45]  E. Fox.  The Role of Reader Characteristics in Processing and Learning From Informational Text , 2009 .

[46]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning , 2010 .

[47]  Nancy C. Rhodes,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: believing it is simple does not make it so , 1992 .

[48]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[49]  Nicola Ariasi,et al.  Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? , 2010 .

[50]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[51]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Does the Influence of Reading Purpose on Reports of Strategic Text Processing Depend on Students' Topic Knowledge? , 2004 .

[52]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Personal epistemology across cultures: exploring Norwegian and Spanish university students’ epistemic beliefs about climate change , 2009 .

[53]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs of Gifted High School Students. , 1997 .

[54]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts , 2009 .

[55]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple‐text comprehension among upper secondary students , 2009 .

[56]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Development and Validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI) , 2001 .

[57]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  When law students read multiple documents about global warming: examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing , 2010 .

[58]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. , 2014, The British journal of educational psychology.

[59]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model , 2011 .

[60]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information† , 2012 .

[61]  Marlene Schommer.  Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[62]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  The Effects of ‘Playing Historian’ on Learning in History , 1996 .

[63]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[64]  Michelle Buehl,et al.  Assessing the Multidimensionality of Students’ Epistemic Beliefs Across Diverse Cultures , 2008 .

[65]  B. Vansledright,et al.  Reading American History: The Influence of Multiple Sources on Six Fifth Graders , 1998, The Elementary School Journal.

[66]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Studying and Using Multiple Documents in History: Effects of Discipline Expertise , 1997 .

[67]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Personal Epistemology The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing , 2002 .

[68]  Keiichi Kobayashi.  The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college experience on students' comprehension of controversial texts , 2009 .

[69]  S. Wineburg.  Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence , 1991 .

[70]  P. Alexander,et al.  Beliefs About Academic Knowledge , 2001 .

[71]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[72]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation , 1998 .

[73]  Nicola Ariasi,et al.  Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information , 2010 .

[74]  B. Hofer,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college , 2004 .

[75]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Changing epistemological beliefs: the unexpected impact of a short-term intervention. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[76]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information , 2002 .

[77]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Literacies for Learning: A Multiple Source Comprehension Illustration , 2013 .

[78]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. , 1999 .

[79]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level. , 2010 .

[80]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Dealing with Conflicting or Consistent Medical Information on the Web: When Expert Information Breeds Laypersons' Doubts about Experts. , 2011 .

[81]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[82]  C. Kardash,et al.  Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. , 1996 .

[83]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Summary versus Argument Tasks when Working with Multiple Documents: Which Is Better for Whom?. , 2010 .

[84]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Domain-Generality and Domain-Specificity in Personal Epistemology Research: Philosophical and Empirical Reflections in the Development of a Theoretical Framework , 2006 .

[85]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains , 2012 .

[86]  C. Kardash,et al.  Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. , 2000 .

[87]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Students' Strategic Use of Multiple Sources During Expository Text Reading: A Longitudinal Think-Aloud Study , 2003 .

[88]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding , 2008 .

[89]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  Are epistemological beliefs similar across domains , 1995 .

[90]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Effects of Task Instruction and Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts About Climate Change , 2009 .

[91]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Reader beliefs and meaning construction in narrative text. , 2000 .

[92]  P. Alexander,et al.  Adolescents as Readers , 2010 .