What affects information systems development team performance? An exploratory study from the perspective of combined socio-technical theory and coordination theory

Quality is an important factor in information systems development (ISD), and ISD team performance closely relates to quality. To better understand ISD teams, we empirically tested a model on ISD team performance by combining socio-technical theory and coordination theory. Using existing empirical studies and data collected from three well-known ISD companies in China, our research results identified influential characteristics of ISD team performance, and revealed similarities and differences between China's ISD team performance and those in other countries. By the results, we find that knowledge sharing and major do not affect team performance. The compensation satisfaction to job performance is not significant in China, either. Our research provides suggestions for building and supporting ISD teams that could lead to performance improvements.

[1]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Leadership: do traits matter? , 1991 .

[2]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[3]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[6]  R. Campbell,et al.  A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. , 1968 .

[7]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge During Skill Acquisition of a Complex Task , 2001 .

[8]  David Lei,et al.  Management practices in learning organizations , 1992 .

[9]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[10]  J. Pinto,et al.  Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development , 1990 .

[11]  Chee Sing Yap,et al.  Issues in Managing Information Technology , 1989 .

[12]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[13]  Earl H. McKinney,et al.  The role of communication values in swift starting action teams: IT insights from flight crew experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[14]  David Wilemon,et al.  Creating High-Performing Software Development Teams , 2005 .

[15]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[16]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  The Principles of Sociotechnical Design , 1976 .

[17]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Linda I. Glassop,et al.  The Organizational Benefits of Teams , 2002 .

[19]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  The Standish report: does it really describe a software crisis? , 2006, CACM.

[20]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  The Leadership Engine: How Winning Companies Build Leaders at Every Level , 1997 .

[21]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the cause , 1977 .

[22]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[23]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Groupand Individual Training , 1998 .

[24]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Developing a knowledge-based perspective on coordination: The case of global software projects , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Antecedents of Coordination Effectiveness of Software Developer Dyads From Interacting Teams: An Empirical Investigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[26]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[28]  James E. Tomayko,et al.  The structural complexity of software an experimental test , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[29]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[30]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Handbook of human resource management , 1995 .

[32]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Sandra J. Hartman,et al.  Exploring the relationship between total quality management and information systems development , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[34]  H. Kaiser An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[35]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Effects of participative management on the performance of software development teams , 1994, SIGCPR '94.

[37]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Communication and performance in software development projects , 2001 .

[39]  Michael C. Sturman,et al.  Using Your Pay System to Improve Employees' Performance: How You Pay Makes a Difference , 2006 .

[40]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Leadership of information systems development projects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[42]  Hong-Da Wang,et al.  Controllability as a Moderator of the Effect of Salaries on Performance: An Empirical Study , 2007 .

[43]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[44]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[45]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Object-oriented and conventional analysis and design methodologies , 1992, Computer.

[46]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Sociotechnical issues in the implementation of imaging technology , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Susan L. Kichuk,et al.  The big five personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams , 1997 .

[48]  C. Huxham,et al.  Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World , 2000 .

[49]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[50]  Hyun-Soo Han,et al.  Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Marc J. Wallace,et al.  Compensation theory and practice , 1983 .

[52]  Daphna F. Raskas,et al.  Multifunctional managerial development: A framework for evaluating the options , 1992 .

[53]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Michel Patry,et al.  A multi‐level, multi‐theory perspective of information technology implementation , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[55]  P. Costa,et al.  Four ways five factors are basic , 1992 .

[56]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[57]  Venugopal Balijepally,et al.  Assessing Personality Profiles of Software Developers in Agile Development Teams , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  The Effective Use of Automated Application Development Tools , 1997, IBM Syst. J..

[59]  Paul S. Hempel,et al.  Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Hee-Dong Yang,et al.  An exploratory study on meta skills in software development teams: antecedent cooperation skills and personality for shared mental models , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[63]  Marleen A. O’Connor,et al.  Human Capital ERA : Reconceptualizing Corporate Law to Facilitate Labor-Management Cooperation , 1993 .

[64]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[65]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[66]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Mediators between coordination and IS project performance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[67]  E. A. Locke The nature and causes of job satisfaction , 1976 .

[68]  William J. Doll,et al.  Avenues for Top Management Involvement in Successful MIS Development , 1985, MIS Q..

[69]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[70]  L. James Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[71]  Jonathan P. Allen The Evolution of New Mobile Applications: A Sociotechnical Perspective , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[72]  Alvin J. Silk,et al.  Measuring Influence in Organizational Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[73]  Robert L. Glass,et al.  Strong vs. weak approaches to systems development , 1998, CACM.

[74]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Effects of intra‐group conflict on packaged software development team performance , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[75]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Impact of Task and Technology on Group Performance , 1986 .

[76]  R. Hogan Personality and personality measurement. , 1991 .

[77]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[78]  L. Thompson,et al.  Improving the creativity of organizational work groups , 2003 .

[79]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[80]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..