Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment?

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of English proficiency (low vs. high) and material presentation mode (single channel vs. dual channel) on English listening comprehension, cognitive load and learning attitude in a ubiquitous learning environment. An experimental learning activity was implemented using PDA as a learning tool to facilitate learning. A quasi-experimental design was employed with university students participating in the experiment. The results revealed that (a) high English proficiency learners had significantly better English listening comprehension and lower intrinsic and extraneous load than low English proficiency learners; (b) both high and low English proficiency learners learning with dual channel had significantly better English listening comprehension and held more positive attitude toward the ubiquitous learning environment than learners learning with single channel; (c) for learners learning with single channel, low English proficiency learners had significantly higher extraneous load than high English proficiency learners; and (d) for low English proficiency learners, learners who learned with dual channel possessed significantly lower extraneous load than learners who learned with single channel. The suggestions for educators and instructional designers were also discussed in the present study.

[1]  Anand K. Gramopadhye,et al.  Evaluation of alternate multimedia for web-based asynchronous learning , 2007 .

[2]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[3]  Susan Bull,et al.  Context and Learner Modelling for the Mobile Foreign Language Learner , 2005 .

[4]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Tsung-Yu Liu,et al.  Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Helen Gant Guillory,et al.  The Effects of Keyword Captions to Authentic French Video on Learner Comprehension , 2013 .

[7]  R. Mayer,et al.  Aids to computer-based multimedia learning , 2002 .

[8]  Tan-Hsu Tan,et al.  RFID-based Ubiquitous Learning Environment for Outdoor Learning , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[9]  John N. Williams,et al.  The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling , 2002 .

[10]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[11]  Shiho Yoshino,et al.  The Effects of the L1 and L2 Caption Presentation Timing on Listening Comprehension , 2000 .

[12]  Larry Vandergrift Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research , 2007, Language Teaching.

[13]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[14]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[15]  Jang-Ping Sheu,et al.  Realizing Outdoor Independent Learning with a Butterfly-Watching Mobile Learning System , 2005 .

[16]  Tak-Wai Chan,et al.  Concept and design of Ad Hoc and Mobile classrooms , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[18]  Fred Paas,et al.  Learner and Information Characteristics in the Design of Powerful Learning Environments , 2006 .

[19]  Susan Smith Nash,et al.  Mobile Learning, Cognitive Architecture and the Study of Literature , 2007 .

[20]  Paul L. Markham,et al.  The effects of captioned television videotapes on the listening comprehension of beginning, intermediate, and advanced ESL students , 1989 .

[21]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities , 2010 .

[22]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[23]  Paul Markham,et al.  The Influence of Culture-Specific Background Knowledge and Captions on Second Language Comprehension , 2001 .

[24]  F. Paas,et al.  Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning , 2006 .

[25]  Paul Chandler,et al.  The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language. , 2007, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  Julie Pallant,et al.  SPSS survival manual : a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows , 2001, Behaviour Change.

[27]  Gregory Taylor,et al.  Perceived Processing Strategies of Students Watching Captioned Video , 2005 .

[28]  Jurgen Froehlich German Videos with German Subtitles: A New Approach to Listening Comprehension Development. , 1988 .

[29]  Marie K. Iding Is Seeing Believing? Features of Effective Multimedia for Learning Science , 2000 .

[30]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[31]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[32]  Martine Danan,et al.  Captioning and Subtitling: Undervalued Language Learning Strategies , 2004 .

[33]  Chun-yan Guo,et al.  Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words , 2006, Brain and Language.

[34]  M. Rost Teaching and Researching Listening , 2001 .

[35]  David E. Eskey,et al.  The Effects of Closed-Captioned Television on the Listening Comprehension of Intermediate English as a Second Language (ESL) Students , 1999 .

[36]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  A Conceptual Framework of Computer-Supported Ubiquitous Learning Environment , 2005 .

[37]  Chih-Min Shih The General English Proficiency Test , 2008 .

[38]  Volker Hegelheimer,et al.  Help Options and Multimedia Listening: Students' Use of Subtitles and the Transcript , 2007 .

[39]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .