A Polynomial-Based Linear Mapping Strategy for Feedforward Compensation of Hysteresis in Piezoelectric Actuators

A set of memory-based properties is employed in this paper for modeling multiple-path hysteresis response of piezoelectric actuators. These properties, namely, targeting turning points, curve alignment, and wiping-out effect, are applied in a linear mapping strategy to develop a mathematical framework for modeling the hysteresis phenomenon. More specifically, the locations of turning points are detected and recorded for the prediction of future hysteresis trajectory. An internal trajectory is assumed to follow a multiple-segmented path via a continuous connection of several curves passing through every two consequent turning points. These curves adopt their shapes via a linear mapping strategy from the reference hysteresis curves with polynomial configurations. Experimental implementation of the proposed method demonstrates slight improvement over the widely used Prandtl-Ishlinskii hysteresis operator. However, to maintain the level of precision during the operation, a sufficient number of memory units must be included to record the turning points. Otherwise, in the event of memory saturation, two memory-allocation modes, namely, "open" and "closed" strategies, can be implemented. It is shown that the closed memory-allocation strategy demonstrates better performance by keeping the most important target points. The proposed modeling framework is adopted in an inverse model-based control scheme for feedforward compensation of hysteresis nonlinearity. The controller is experimentally implemented on a three-dimensional nanopositioning stage for surface topography tracking, a problem typically encountered in scanning probe microscopy applications.

[1]  S. Li-ning,et al.  Hysteresis and creep compensation for piezoelectric actuator in open-loop operation , 2005 .

[2]  Takayuki Shibata,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of diamond AFM probe integrated with PZT thin film sensor and actuator , 2004 .

[3]  Musa Jouaneh,et al.  Modeling hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators , 1995 .

[4]  Jonq-Jer Tzen,et al.  Modeling of piezoelectric actuator for compensation and controller design , 2003 .

[5]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Lumped Parameter Electromechanical Model for Describing the Nonlinear Behavior of Piezoelectric Actuators , 1997 .

[6]  Shaoze Yan,et al.  A 3-DOFs mobile robot driven by a piezoelectric actuator , 2006 .

[7]  Musa Jouaneh,et al.  Generalized preisach model for hysteresis nonlinearity of piezoceramic actuators , 1997 .

[8]  K. Kuhnen,et al.  Inverse feedforward controller for complex hysteretic nonlinearities in smart-material systems , 2001 .

[9]  Lining Sun,et al.  Improving positioning accuracy of piezoelectric actuators by feedforward hysteresis compensation based on a new mathematical model , 2005 .

[10]  Jiashi Yang,et al.  A piezoelectric gyroscope based on extensional vibrations of rods , 2003 .

[11]  N. Jalili,et al.  Intelligence rules of hysteresis in the feedforward trajectory control of piezoelectrically-driven nanostagers , 2007 .

[12]  Saeid Bashash,et al.  Robust Multiple Frequency Trajectory Tracking Control of Piezoelectrically Driven Micro/Nanopositioning Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  D. Berlincourt Piezoelectric ceramics: Characteristics and applications , 1980 .

[14]  N. Wakatsuki,et al.  A tubular piezoelectric vibrator gyroscope , 2006, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[15]  R. Ben Mrad,et al.  A discrete-time compensation algorithm for hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators , 2004 .

[16]  Saeid Bashash,et al.  A New Hysteresis Model for Piezoelectric Actuators With Application to Precision Trajectory Control , 2005 .

[17]  N. Jalili,et al.  Underlying memory-dominant nature of hysteresis in piezoelectric materials , 2006 .

[18]  S. Li-ning,et al.  Tracking control of piezoelectric actuator based on a new mathematical model , 2004 .

[19]  Urban Simu,et al.  High accuracy piezoelectric-based microrobot for biomedical applications , 2001, ETFA 2001. 8th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8597).

[20]  Saeid Bashash,et al.  Modeling of piezo-flexural nanopositioning systems subjected to rate-varying inputs , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[21]  Reinder Banning,et al.  Modeling piezoelectric actuators , 2000 .

[22]  H. Hu,et al.  Enhancement of tracking ability in piezoceramic actuators subject to dynamic excitation conditions , 2005, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.