EFFICACY OF DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT FOR REFRACTORY MACULAR EDEMA CAUSED BY RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Purpose: To investigate efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant in treating refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion. Methods: Retrospective chart review. Results: Twenty-two eyes with refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion were treated with a mean of 2.2 DEX over 12 months. Patient had previously received a mean of 7 treatments (laser, bevacizumab, and/or triamcinolone) for macular edema present for at least 4 months duration (mean 20.8 ± 17.6 months, range 4–72 months) before starting DEX. Mean baseline visual acuity was 20/91, and mean central subfield thickness was 506 &mgr;m. DEX improved mean best-corrected visual acuity to 20/75 and 20/66 at 7 weeks and 6 months follow-up, although it worsened to 20/132 at 12 months. Mean central subfield thickness improved to 292, 352, and 356 &mgr;m at 7 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between number of DEX treatments and central subfield thickness (P = 3.28 × 10−9). There was a statistically significant association between number of days followed and best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.006). Six of 12 (50%) phakic patients developed visually significant cataract requiring surgery. Five of 22 (23%) patients developed ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure > 30) and consequently did not undergo further treatment with DEX. Conclusion: DEX resulted in sustained anatomical reduction of retinal vein occlusion–associated refractory macular edema, although this did not translate into long-term best-corrected visual acuity improvement in either phakic or pseudophakic patients, possibly related to chronic structural alterations in the retina despite reduction of edema.

[1]  R. Guthoff,et al.  [Does OCT morphology provide indications for prognosis of visual acuity after venous occlusion? : SD-OCT analysis in retinal vein occlusion before and after resolution of initial macular edema]. , 2016, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[2]  J. F. Arevalo,et al.  INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT FOR THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY MACULAR EDEMA IN RETINAL VASCULAR DISEASES: Results of the KKESH International Collaborative Retina Study Group , 2016, Retina.

[3]  D. Călugăru,et al.  Pro-permeability Factors After Dexamethasone Implant in Retinal Vein Occlusion; The Ozurdex for Retinal Vein Occlusion (ORVO) Study. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  P. Campochiaro,et al.  Sustained delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous implants: long-term benefit in patients with chronic diabetic macular edema. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Taban,et al.  RECALCITRANT MACULAR EDEMA AFTER INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB IS RESPONSIVE TO AN INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT IN RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION , 2013, Retina.

[6]  J. Vander,et al.  Sustained Benefits from Ranibizumab for Macular Edema following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Phase III Study , 2012 .

[7]  N. Karia Retinal vein occlusion: pathophysiology and treatment options , 2010, Clinical ophthalmology.

[8]  Matus Rehak,et al.  Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Pathogenesis, Visual Prognosis, and Treatment Modalities , 2008, Current eye research.

[9]  Sharon D. Solomon,et al.  Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: implication of VEGF as a critical stimulator. , 2007, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[10]  J. Tarbell,et al.  Vascular permeability in experimental diabetes is associated with reduced endothelial occludin content: vascular endothelial growth factor decreases occludin in retinal endothelial cells. Penn State Retina Research Group. , 1998, Diabetes.

[11]  R. Wright Vascular Permeability in Experimental Brain Tumors , 1967, Angiology.