Learning from the past to predict the future: an historical analysis of grass invasions in northern Australia

An important focus of biosecurity is anticipating future risks, but time lags between introduction, naturalisation, and (ultimately) impact mean that future risks can be strongly influenced by history. We conduct a comprehensive historical analysis of tropical grasses (n = 155) that have naturalised in Australia since European settlement (1788) to determine what factors shaped historical patterns of naturalisation and future risks, including for the 21 species that cause serious negative impacts. Most naturalised species were from the Old World (78 %), were introduced for use in pasture (64.5 %), were first recorded prior to 1940 (84.5 %) and naturalised before 1980 (90.3 %). Patterns for high-impact species were similar, with all being first recorded in Australia by 1940, and only seven naturalised since then—five intentionally introduced as pasture species. Counter to expectations, we found no evidence for increased naturalisation with increasing trade, including for species introduced unintentionally for which the link was expected to be strongest. New pathways have not emerged since the 1930s despite substantial shifts in trading patterns. Furthermore, introduction and naturalisation rates are now at or approaching historically low levels. Three reasons were identified: (1) the often long lag phase between introduction and reported naturalisation means naturalisation rates reflect historical trends in introduction rates; (2) important introduction pathways are not directly related to trade volume and globalisation; and (3) that species pools may become depleted. The last of these appears to be the case for the most important pathway for tropical grasses, i.e. the intentional introduction of useful pasture species. Assuming that new pathways don’t arise that might result in increased naturalisation rates, and that current at-border biosecurity practices remain in place, we conclude that most future high-impact tropical grass species are already present in Australia. Our results highlight the need to continually test underlying assumptions regarding future naturalisation rates of high-impact invasive species, as conclusions have important implications for how best to manage future biosecurity risks.

[1]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[2]  H. Mooney,et al.  Invasive Alien Species in an Era of Globalization , 2007 .

[3]  M. Arianoutsou,et al.  Alien Vascular Plants of Europe , 2009 .

[4]  Tim Wenskus.  Ecology and Control of Introduced Plants , 2006 .

[5]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. , 1995 .

[6]  F. Castri,et al.  Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective , 1989 .

[7]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  N. Marshall,et al.  Tackling Contentious Invasive Plant Species: A Case Study of Buffel Grass in Australia , 2012, Environmental Management.

[9]  D. Richardson,et al.  Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review , 2011 .

[10]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Adding Biofuels to the Invasive Species Fire? , 2006, Science.

[11]  Nagwa Riad,et al.  Changing Patterns of Global Trade , 2012 .

[12]  R. Groves,et al.  Weed risk assessment for plant introductions to Australia. , 2001 .

[13]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[14]  C. Daehler,et al.  Short Lag Times for Invasive Tropical Plants: Evidence from Experimental Plantings in Hawai'i , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  Peter Caley,et al.  Estimating the invasion success of introduced plants , 2007 .

[16]  Charles C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1959, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[18]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Agricultural Research, Productivity, and Food Prices in the Long Run , 2009, Science.

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  R. Groves,et al.  Planned invasions of Australian tropical savannas. , 1986 .

[21]  R. Groves,et al.  Ecology of biological invasions. , 1986 .

[22]  F Dane Panetta,et al.  An analysis of assessment outcomes from eight years' operation of the Australian border weed risk assessment system. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Panetta,et al.  The Biology Of Australian Weeds , 1995 .

[24]  W. Lonsdale.  Inviting trouble: Introduced pasture species in northern Australia , 1994 .

[25]  M. Rosenzweig.  The four questions: What does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity? , 2001 .

[26]  P. Hulme.  Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization , 2009 .

[27]  Lindsay B. Hutley,et al.  Turning up the heat: the impacts of Andropogon gayanus (gamba grass) invasion on fire behaviour in northern Australian savannas , 2010 .

[28]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[29]  B. Murray,et al.  Introduction history and invasion success in exotic vines introduced to Australia , 2007 .

[30]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[31]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  The United States naturalized flora: Largely the product of deliberate introductions' , 2002 .

[32]  Jan Pergl,et al.  A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment , 2012, Global Change Biology.

[33]  P. Whitehead,et al.  Biodiversity and invasive grass species: multiple-use or monoculture? , 2005 .

[34]  I. Noble,et al.  The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[35]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Deliberate Introductions of Species: Research Needs Benefits can be reaped, but risks are high , 1999 .

[36]  B. Pengelly,et al.  Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool , 2005 .

[37]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis for intentional plant introductions under uncertainty , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[38]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  Lag‐phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts , 2010 .

[39]  F. D. Panetta,et al.  WEED RISK ASSESSMENT , 2008 .

[40]  Margaret Byrne,et al.  An environmental weed risk assessment model for Australian forage improvement programs , 2008 .

[41]  Shaun R. Coutts,et al.  Are High-Impact Species Predictable? An Analysis of Naturalised Grasses in Northern Australia , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  N. Marshall,et al.  Reducing contention amongst organisations dealing with commercially valuable but invasive plants: The case of buffel grass , 2011 .

[43]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Bioinvasions and Globalization: Ecology, Economics, Management, and Policy , 2010 .

[44]  S. Lowe,et al.  100 of the world's worst invasive alien species. A selection from the global invasive species database , 2004 .

[45]  G. Cook,et al.  It was no accident: deliberate plant introductions by Australian government agencies during the 20th century , 2006 .