Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation

Summary Precipitation patterns in the tropics are characterized by extremely high spatial and temporal variability that are difficult to adequately represent with rain gauge networks. Since precipitation is commonly the most important input data in hydrological models, model performance and uncertainty will be negatively impacted in areas with sparse rain gauge networks. To investigate the influence of precipitation uncertainty on both model parameters and predictive uncertainty in a data sparse region, the integrated river basin model SWAT was calibrated against measured streamflow of the Pipiripau River in Central Brazil. Calibration was conducted using an ensemble of different precipitation data sources, including: (1) point data from the only available rain gauge within the watershed, (2) a smoothed version of the gauge data derived using a moving average, (3) spatially distributed data using Thiessen polygons (which includes rain gauges from outside the watershed), and (4) Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission radar data. For each precipitation input model, the best performing parameter set and their associated uncertainty ranges were determined using the Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure. Although satisfactory streamflow simulations were generated with each precipitation input model, the results of our study indicate that parameter uncertainty varied significantly depending upon the method used for precipitation data-set generation. Additionally, improved deterministic streamflow predictions and more reliable probabilistic forecasts were generated using different ensemble-based methods, such as the arithmetic ensemble mean, and more advanced Bayesian Model Averaging schemes. This study shows that ensemble modeling with multiple precipitation inputs can considerably increase the level of confidence in simulation results, particularly in data-poor regions.

[1]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT , 2007 .

[2]  Jonathan J. Gourley,et al.  A method for identifying sources of model uncertainty in rainfall-runoff simulations , 2004 .

[3]  Mohamed M. Hantush,et al.  Hydrologic Modeling of an Eastern Pennsylvania Watershed with NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Data , 2006 .

[4]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[5]  Jing Yang,et al.  Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China , 2008 .

[6]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[7]  Robert J. Marquis,et al.  6. Vegetation Physiognomies and Woody Flora of the Cerrado Biome , 2002 .

[8]  M. Clark,et al.  A multimodel ensemble forecast framework: Application to spring seasonal flows in the Gunnison River Basin , 2006 .

[9]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[10]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  How probability weighting affects participation in water markets , 2006 .

[11]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[12]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM) I: Model intercomparison with current land use , 2009 .

[13]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging , 2009 .

[14]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure , 2004 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[16]  S. Nieuwolt,et al.  Tropical climatology: An introduction to the climates of the low latitudes , 1978 .

[17]  V. Lopes On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modelling , 1996 .

[18]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modelling blue and green water resources availability in Iran , 2009 .

[19]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[20]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Using NEXRAD and rain gauge precipitation data for hydrologic calibration of SWAT in a Northeastern watershed. , 2010 .

[21]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Coping with model structural uncertainty in medium-term hydro-climatic forecasting , 2011 .

[22]  David D. Bosch,et al.  Effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on temporal and spatial uncertainty of SWAT output. , 2009 .

[23]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[24]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[25]  Naresh Devineni,et al.  Multimodel ensembles of streamflow forecasts: Role of predictor state in developing optimal combinations , 2007, Water resources research.

[26]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia , 2009 .

[27]  D. R. Dawdy,et al.  Effect of rainfall variability on streamflow simulation , 1969 .

[28]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[29]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM) III: scenario analysis , 2009 .

[30]  Jacques Lavabre,et al.  Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models , 2001 .

[31]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modelling(LUCHEM) II: ensemble combinations and predictions , 2009 .

[32]  M. J. Hall,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modelling , 2004 .

[33]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  A sequential Bayesian approach for hydrologic model selection and prediction , 2009 .

[34]  Newsha K. Ajami,et al.  Addressing snow model uncertainty for hydrologic prediction , 2010 .

[35]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling , 1995 .

[36]  Dan B. Jaynes,et al.  Effect of the accuracy of spatial rainfall information on the modeling of water, sediment, and NO3–N loads at the watershed level , 2005 .

[37]  Frédéric Fabry,et al.  The effect of gauge sampling density on the accuracy of streamflow prediction for rural catchments , 1993 .

[38]  Mohamed Sultan,et al.  A remote sensing solution for estimating runoff and recharge in arid environments , 2009 .

[39]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles , 2004 .

[40]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran , 2008 .

[41]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[42]  P. Krause,et al.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EFFICIENCY CRITERIA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODEL ASSESSMENT , 2005 .

[43]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  Modeling Runoff Response to Land Cover and Rainfall Spatial Variability in Semi-Arid Watersheds , 2000 .

[44]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[45]  Kenneth J. Tobin,et al.  Using SWAT to Model Streamflow in Two River Basins With Ground and Satellite Precipitation Data 1 , 2009 .

[46]  Lucy Marshall,et al.  Towards dynamic catchment modelling: a Bayesian hierarchical mixtures of experts framework , 2007 .

[47]  J. Rockström,et al.  Balancing Water for Humans and Nature: The New Approach in Ecohydrology , 2004 .

[48]  A. Bárdossy,et al.  Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application , 2006 .

[49]  Brent M. Troutman,et al.  Runoff prediction errors and bias in parameter estimation induced by spatial variability of precipitation , 1983 .

[50]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .

[51]  F. H. Frimmel,et al.  Challenges of an integrated water resource management for the Distrito Federal, Western Central Brazil: climate, land-use and water resources , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[52]  Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior,et al.  Mapa pedológico digital - SIG atualizado do Distrito Federal Escala 1:100.000 e uma síntese do texto explicativo , 2004 .

[53]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  STREAM FLOW ESTIMATION USING SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL IN THE TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TEXAS , 2004 .

[54]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .