Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction

Recent constraint satisfaction models of explanation, analogy, and decision making claim that these processes are influenced by bidirectional constraints that promote coherence. College students were asked to reach a verdict in a complex legal case involving multiple conflicting arguments, including alternative analogies to the target case. Participants rated agreement with the individual arguments both in isolation before seeing the case and again after reaching a verdict. Assessments of the individual arguments shifted so as to cohere with their emerging verdict. A cascade of spreading coherence influenced decisions made about a subsequent case involving different legal issues. Participants' memory for their initial positions also shifted so as to cohere with their final positions. The results demonstrate that constraint satisfaction can transform ambiguous inputs into coherent decisions.

[1]  F. Heider.  Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[2]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[3]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[4]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Cognitive consistency and attitude change. , 1960 .

[5]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .

[6]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[7]  D. Bem,et al.  Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: on the salience of premanipulation attitudes. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  John E. Taplin,et al.  Interpretation of Abstract Conditional Sentences in Deductive Reasoning. , 1973 .

[9]  M. Ross,et al.  Increasing the salience of initial attitudes: dissonance versus self-perception theory. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  George R. Goethals,et al.  The Perception of Consistency in Attitudes. , 1973 .

[11]  E. Loftus,et al.  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory , 1974 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  J. Laird,et al.  Awareness and attitude change in the forced-compliance paradigm: The importance of when. , 1976 .

[14]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[15]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  D. Ewoldsen,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology.

[17]  N. Pennington,et al.  Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. , 1986 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[19]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[20]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Explanatory Coherence and Belief Revision in Naive Physics , 1988 .

[21]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[22]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[23]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[24]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  D. Kuhn.  Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  W. Mcguire.  Dynamic operations of thought systems. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[27]  Franz Josef Radermacher,et al.  Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Judea Pearl) , 1990, SIAM Rev..

[28]  S. Read,et al.  Rapist or "Regular Guy": Explanatory Coherence in the Construction of Mental Models of Others , 1993 .

[29]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  A Coherence Model of Cognitive Consistency: Dynamics of Attitude Change During the Persian Gulf War , 1993 .

[30]  N. Pennington,et al.  Reasoning in explanation-based decision making , 1993, Cognition.

[31]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[32]  Memory Errors From A Change of Standard: A Lack of Awareness or of Understanding? , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Christopher Hoadley,et al.  "I Know One When I See One": How (Much) Do Hypotheses Differ from Evidence? , 1994 .

[34]  T. E. Lange,et al.  Below the Surface: Analogical Similarity and Retrieval Competition in Reminding , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[36]  S. Read,et al.  Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. , 1994 .

[37]  David Leake,et al.  Inference to the Best Plan: a Coherence Theory of Decision , 1995 .

[38]  D. Medin,et al.  Similarity and Alignment in Choice , 1995 .

[39]  G Lindemann Patricia,et al.  Alignability and attribute importance in choice , 1996 .

[40]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[41]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatics in Analogical Mapping , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  T. E. Lange,et al.  Remote analogical reminding , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[43]  T. Shultz,et al.  Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. , 1996, Psychological review.