A comparative study of fully coupled and de-coupled methods on dynamic behaviour of floating wind turbine drivetrains

Abstract Traditionally, drivetrain responses are obtained by a de-coupled analysis, which first involves a global analysis with a simplified representation of the drivetrain, followed by a detailed analysis of the drivetrain with the input of global response on the drivetrain interface. As the wind turbine size increases, it is questionable whether this de-coupled analysis method yields sufficiently accurate results. To address this question, a comparative study of the drivetrain dynamic behaviour obtained by a fully coupled method and a de-coupled one, is conducted and reported in this paper. A 10-MW fully coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic floating wind turbine dynamic model is developed, including a high-fidelity drivetrain. The developed fully coupled model is assessed to be reasonable via the comparison of drivetrain first-order natural frequency and code-to-code comparisons in terms of global responses between two simulation tools Simpack and Fast. Resonance analysis of the 10-MW drivetrain in the fully coupled model is performed, with focus on rotor-drivetrain-bedplate-tower coupled modes in the low frequency range. Time domain simulations of the drivetrain in the fully coupled and the de-coupled models are carried out in different environmental conditions. One-hour fatigue damage of drivetrain gears and bearings in the fully coupled and de-coupled models are compared. Effect of nacelle motion on drivetrain fatigue damage in the de-coupled analysis is discussed. The results are presented to demonstrate whether the de-coupled method could be confidently used for drivetrain dynamic analysis. This study provides a basis for drivetrain design and dynamic analysis in floating wind turbines.

[1]  Kexiang Wei,et al.  Flexible dynamic modeling and analysis of drive train for Offshore Floating Wind Turbine , 2020 .

[2]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  FAST User's Guide - Updated August 2005 , 2005 .

[3]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  On design, modelling, and analysis of a 10‐MW medium‐speed drivetrain for offshore wind turbines , 2020, Wind Energy.

[4]  Shengtao Zhou,et al.  Importance of platform mounting orientation of Y-shaped semi-submersible floating wind turbines: A case study by using surrogate models , 2020 .

[5]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Modelling and analysis of floating spar-type wind turbine drivetrain , 2014 .

[6]  G. Scott,et al.  IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine , 2020 .

[7]  Yi Guo,et al.  Characterizing the Influence of Abstraction in Full-Scale Wind Turbine Nacelle Testing , 2016 .

[8]  Zhike Peng,et al.  A numerical study on the angle of attack to the blade of a horizontal-axis offshore floating wind turbine under static and dynamic yawed conditions , 2019, Energy.

[9]  Henrik Bredmose,et al.  State-of-the-art model for the LIFES50+ OO-Star Wind Floater Semi 10MW floating wind turbine , 2018 .

[10]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Effects of bedplate flexibility on drivetrain dynamics: Case study of a 10 MW spar type floating wind turbine , 2020 .

[11]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Stochastic dynamic load effect and fatigue damage analysis of drivetrains in land-based and TLP, spar and semi-submersible floating wind turbines☆ , 2015 .

[12]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[13]  Patrick Moriarty,et al.  AeroDyn Theory Manual , 2005 .

[14]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  On Initial Design and Modelling of a 10 MW Medium Speed Drivetrain for Offshore Wind Turbines , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[15]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  On long-term fatigue damage and reliability analysis of gears under wind loads in offshore wind turbine drivetrains , 2014 .

[16]  Peter Tavner,et al.  Wind turbine downtime and its importance for offshore deployment. , 2011 .

[17]  W. Cummins THE IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTION AND SHIP MOTIONS , 2010 .