Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms

While most advocate that foreign firms should utilize managerial ties to conduct business in China, recent literature cautions that such ties may offer only conditional value. This study examines three sources of heterogeneity that may condition the value of ties: firm ownership (foreign vs. domestic), competition, and structural uncertainty. Results from a survey of 280 firms in China indicate that though foreign and domestic firms utilize ties at a similar level, their performance gains from tie utilization differ. Managerial ties have a monotonic, positive effect on performance for domestic firms, whereas the effect is curvilinear (i.e., inverted U-shaped) for foreign firms. Therefore, compared with domestic firms, foreign firms have a competitive disadvantage from tie utilization. Furthermore, managerial ties are less effective for fostering performance when competition becomes more intense. However, ties lead to higher levels of firm performance when structural uncertainty increases. Overall, these results support the contingency view of managerial ties and caution companies about the unconditional use of ties as the market becomes more heterogeneous. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[2]  B. Hattingh The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[3]  Xueli Wang,et al.  Today's state‐owned enterprises of China: are they dying dinosaurs or dynamic dynamos? , 2006 .

[4]  Robert Buderi,et al.  Guanxi (The Art of Relationships): Microsoft, China, and Bill Gates's Plan to Win the Road Ahead , 2006 .

[5]  K. Zhou,et al.  Organizational changes in emerging economies: drivers and consequences , 2006 .

[6]  J. Li The Formation of Managerial Networks of Foreign Firms in China: The Effects of Strategic Orientations , 2005 .

[7]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis , 2005 .

[8]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[9]  Yadong Luo International Business and Government Relations in the 21st Century: Shifts of Chinese government policies on inbound foreign direct investment , 2005 .

[10]  Amy J. Hillman,et al.  Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[11]  Gerald E. Fryxell,et al.  Successful localization programs in China: an important element in strategy implementation , 2004 .

[12]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Social networks and loss of capital , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[14]  Howard Davies,et al.  Emergent patterns of strategy, environment and performance in a transition economy , 2004 .

[15]  Edward Levitas,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economies: China vs. Russia , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Yadong Luo Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China , 2003 .

[17]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance , 2003 .

[18]  Christine Moorman,et al.  Interfirm Cooperation and Customer Orientation , 2003 .

[19]  Bat Batjargal,et al.  Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance in Russia: A Longitudinal Study , 2003 .

[20]  Mike W. Peng Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices , 2003 .

[21]  T. Fang Inside Chinese Business: a guide for managers worldwide , 2003 .

[22]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Which ties matter when? the contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success , 2003 .

[23]  Sumit K. Kundu,et al.  A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service sector , 2003 .

[24]  J. Mentzer,et al.  The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance , 2002 .

[25]  B. Batjargal,et al.  Entrepreneurs' Access to Private Equity in China: The Role of Social Capital , 2002 .

[26]  Stewart R. Miller,et al.  Is there a liability of foreignness in global banking? An empirical test of banks' X‐efficiency , 2002 .

[27]  Lisa A. Keister,et al.  Exchange Structures in Transition: Lending and Trade Relations in Chinese Business Groups , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[28]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[29]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[30]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[31]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[32]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[33]  Sam Beldona,et al.  Multinationality-Performance Relationship: A Review and Reconceptualization , 2000 .

[34]  John Child,et al.  Organizations As Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: the Case of China , 1999 .

[35]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks? , 1998 .

[36]  J. Dunning An overview of relations with national governments , 1998 .

[37]  D. Guthrie,et al.  The Declining Significance of Guanxi in China's Economic Transition , 1998, The China Quarterly.

[38]  Karen Page,et al.  Network Forms of Organization , 1998 .

[39]  Eric W. K. Tsang Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China , 1998 .

[40]  T. C. Kiong,et al.  Guanxi Bases, Xinyong and Chinese Business Networks , 1998 .

[41]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Uncertainty in the transaction environment: an empirical test , 1998 .

[42]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. , 1997 .

[43]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF THE LIABILITY OF FOREIGNNESS: A GLOBAL STUDY OF SURVIVAL IN FINANCIAL SERVICES , 1997 .

[44]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[45]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[46]  Mayfair M Yang Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China , 1996, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[47]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[48]  M. Boisot,et al.  From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order , 1996 .

[49]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[50]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[51]  S. Kotha,et al.  Strategy and environment as determinants of performance: Evidence from the Japanese machine tool industry , 1995 .

[52]  Joel Podolny Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[53]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[54]  E. Zajac,et al.  FROM TRANSACTION COST TO TRANSACTIONAL VALUE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES* , 1993 .

[55]  Michele Govekar,et al.  Management of the political imperative in international business , 1990 .

[56]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[57]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[58]  L. James Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .