THE RELATIONSHIP OF SECTOR CHARACTERISTICS TO OPERATIONAL ERRORS.

Abstract : An exploratory study was conducted on the relationship of air traffic control (ATC) complexity factors to operational errors (OEs). This consisted of a detailed examination of OE data from 1992 through 1995 from the Atlanta en route center. The Systematic Air Traffic Operations Research Initiative (SATORI) system was used to collect data for the analysis. Sectors were categorized into zero-, low-, and high-error groups. Fifteen sector and traffic flow variables had statistically significant correlations with OE frequency. Four variables were higher for the high-error group as compared to the zero-error group. Sector size was smaller for the high-error group as compared to the combined zero- and low-error categories. A significant multiple correlation was found between overall OE rate and a subset of the ATC complexity measures. The data were also analyzed to define relationships between the complexity measures and controller situational awareness (SA) at the time of the OE. The only statistically significant difference between OEs with and without SA was for horizontal separation. In addition, high-error sectors were characterized by low SA for errors. Certain sector and traffic flow characteristics were associated with these high-error sectors, suggesting that these factors may negatively affect SA. It was concluded that the results demonstrated a relationship between sector complexity and OE rate. Such findings, if extended, could assist with traffic management, sector design activities, and the development of decision-support systems.

[1]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  On modeling ATC work load and sector capacity , 1976 .

[2]  R M Rose,et al.  Objective job difficulty, behavioural response, and sector characteristics in air route traffic control centres. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[3]  Waheed Siddiqee,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Predicting the Number of Potential Conflict Situations at Intersecting Air Routes , 1973 .

[4]  Frank D. Fowler.  Air Traffic Control Problems: A Pilot's View , 1980 .

[5]  Bar-Atid Arad.  NOTES ON THE MEASUREMENT OF CONTROL LOAD AND SECTOR DESIGN IN THE ENROUTE ENVIRONMENT , 1964 .

[6]  C P Langan-Fox,et al.  'Actions not as planned' in military air-traffic control. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[7]  Alison Laura Udal Roberts,et al.  Air Traffic Control , 1986 .

[8]  R. H. Mogford,et al.  The Complexity Construct in Air Traffic Control: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. , 1995 .

[9]  Donald Hameluck,et al.  Underlying Factors in Air Traffic Control Incidents , 1989 .

[10]  W. R. E. Murphy.  The Human Element in Traffic Control , 1931 .

[11]  Mark D. Rodgers.  SATORI: Situation Assessment through Re-Creation of Incidents , 1993 .

[12]  W. Siddiqee.  AIR ROUTE CAPACITY MODELS , 1973 .

[13]  Jacob Empson.  Error auditing in air traffic control , 1987 .

[14]  Par Paul Bertelson,et al.  VITESSE LIBRE ET VITESSE IMPOSEE DANS UNE TACHE SIMULANT LE TRI MECANIQUE DE LA CORRESPONDANCE , 1965 .

[15]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Air traffic control jurisdictions of responsibility and airspace structure , 1973, CDC 1973.

[16]  Edward P. Buckley,et al.  METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS IN REAL-TIME AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM SIMULATION , 1983 .

[17]  Glen A. Gilbert,et al.  Air traffic control , 1973, Nature.

[18]  James W. Danaher,et al.  Human Error in ATC System Operations , 1980 .

[19]  Donald Hameluck,et al.  Ergonomics in air traffic control , 1990 .

[20]  Richard E. Redding.  Analysis of Operational Errors and Workload in Air Traffic Control , 1992 .

[21]  David J. Schroeder,et al.  The Loss of Prescribed Separation between Aircraft: How Does It Occur? , 1982 .