Molecular interactions: On the ambiguity of ordinary statements in biomedical literature

Statements about the behavior of biochemical entities (e.g., about the interaction between two proteins) abound in the literature on molecular biology and are increasingly becoming the targets of information extraction and text mining techniques. We show that an accurate analysis of the semantics of such statements reveals a number of ambiguities that have to be taken into account in the practice of biomedical ontology engineering: such statements can not only be understood as event reporting statements, but also as ascriptions of dispositions or tendencies that may or may not refer to collectives of interacting molecules or even to collectives of interaction events. Both authors contributed equally to this work.

[1]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[2]  Elena Beisswanger,et al.  BioTop: An upper domain ontology for the life sciencesA description of its current structure, contents and interfaces to OBO ontologies , 2008, Appl. Ontology.

[3]  Elena Beisswanger,et al.  From GENIA to BIOTOP - Towards a Top-Level Ontology for Biology , 2006, FOIS.

[4]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  Begründungen a priori - oder: ein frischer Blick auf Dispositionsprädikate , 1997 .

[5]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[6]  Ingvar Johansson The ontology of temperature , 2004 .

[7]  John Heil,et al.  Dispositions , 2005, Synthese.

[8]  J. Blake,et al.  Creating the Gene Ontology Resource : Design and Implementation The Gene Ontology Consortium 2 , 2001 .

[9]  Ludger Jansen,et al.  On Ascribing Dispositions , 2007 .

[10]  R. Hursthouse THE LOGIC OF DECISION AND ACTION , 1969 .

[11]  Karl R. Popper The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[12]  David L. Davidson,et al.  The Logical Form of Action Sentences , 2001 .

[13]  H. Herre,et al.  Ontological Categories in GOL , 2004 .

[14]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[15]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Granularity, scale and collectivity: When size does and does not matter , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  Barry Smith,et al.  The Cornucopia of Formal-Ontological Relations , 2005 .

[17]  M. Chester A law of nature , 2011, 1111.1256.

[18]  Robert Hoehndorf,et al.  GFO-Bio: A biological core ontology , 2008, Appl. Ontology.

[19]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[20]  E. J. Lowe,et al.  The four-category ontology : a metaphysical foundation for natural science , 2006 .

[21]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook , 2007 .

[22]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  A World of Propensities , 1993, Popper's Views on Natural and Social Science.

[23]  Stefan Schulz,et al.  Biomedical ontologies: What part-of is and isn't , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Thesaurus or Logical Ontology, Which One Do We Need for Text Mining? , 2005, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[25]  Ludger Jansen Dispositions, Laws, and Categories , 2007 .

[26]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Text Mining for Biology And Biomedicine , 2005 .

[27]  A. Oliver,et al.  Strategies for a Logic of Plurals , 2001 .

[28]  Renate Bartsch,et al.  The Semantics and Syntax of Number and Numbers , 1973 .

[29]  F B ROGERS,et al.  Medical Subject Headings , 1948, Nature.

[30]  Max Kistler,et al.  Dispositions and Causal Powers , 2007 .

[31]  D. Lindberg,et al.  Unified Medical Language System , 2020, Definitions.

[32]  Ludger Jansen,et al.  Tendencies and Other Realizables in Medical Information Sciences , 2007 .