Peer-To-Peer Recognition of Learning in Open Education

Recognition in education is the acknowledgment of learning achievements. Accreditation is certification of such recognition by an institution, an organization, a government, a community, etc. There are a number of assessment methods by which learning can be evaluated (exam, practicum, etc.) for the purpose of recognition and accreditation, and there are a number of different purposes for the accreditation itself (i.e., job, social recognition, membership in a group, etc). As our world moves from an industrial to a knowledge society, new skills are needed. Social web technologies offer opportunities for learning, which build these skills and allow new ways to assess them. This paper makes the case for a peer-based method of assessment and recognition as a feasible option for accreditation purposes. The peer-based method would leverage online communities and tools, for example digital portfolios, digital trails, and aggregations of individual opinions and ratings into a reliable assessment of quality. Recognition by peers can have a similar function as formal accreditation, and pathways to turn peer recognition into formal credits are outlined. The authors conclude by presenting an open education assessment and accreditation scenario, which draws upon the attributes of open source software communities: trust, relevance, scalability, and transparency.

[1]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Taxonomy of trust: Categorizing P2P reputation systems , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[2]  R. Dore.  The Diploma Disease: Education, Qualification, and Development , 1976 .

[3]  Andreas Schleicher,et al.  PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World , 2007 .

[4]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning. , 2008 .

[5]  Anthony P. Carnevale,et al.  Help Wanted...Credentials Required: Community Colleges in the Knowledge Economy. , 2001 .

[6]  David K. Brown.  The Social Sources of Educational Credentialism: Status Cultures, Labor Markets, and Organizations. , 2001 .

[7]  Y. Benkler,et al.  The Wealth of Networks , 2008 .

[8]  Richard N. Katz,et al.  Book Review: The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of cloud computing. , 2010 .

[9]  Kimberly A. Griffin,et al.  Using mixed-methods approaches to study intersectionality in higher education: New Directions for Institutional Research , 2011 .

[10]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Peer-to-peer prospects , 2003, CACM.

[11]  R. Collins.  The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification , 1979 .

[12]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Kay Jordan Kohl,et al.  Postbaccalaureate futures : new markets, resources, credentials , 2001 .

[14]  M. P. Carter,et al.  Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change , 1974 .

[15]  Toru Iiyoshi,et al.  Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge , 2008 .

[16]  Stephen Downes.  E-learning 2.0 , 2005, ELERN.

[17]  Ivar E. Berg,et al.  Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery , 1971 .

[18]  Derek Keats,et al.  The genesis and emergence of Education 3.0 in higher education and its potential for Africa , 2007, First Monday.

[19]  Robert Englander,et al.  ANALYSES/LITERATURE REVIEWS: Evaluating Competence Using a Portfolio: A Literature Review and Web-Based Application to the ACGME Competencies , 2004, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[20]  Principal Investigator,et al.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of Student Performance in Virtual High School Courses: Using Quantitative Analyses and Data Visualization to Inform Decision Making , 2005 .

[21]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[22]  Daniel E. Atkins and John Seely Brown and Allen L. Hammond,et al.  A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities , 2007 .

[23]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The University in the Networked Economy and Society: Challenges and Opportunities , 2008 .

[24]  Jan Philipp Schmidt,et al.  Open courseware as an example for user-centric innovation in higher education – towards a new social role of the university , 2008 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[26]  Richard A. Voorhees,et al.  Measuring what matters competency-based learning models in higher education , 2001 .

[27]  Philip G. Altbach,et al.  American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political and Economic Challenges. , 1999 .

[28]  S. Dornbusch,et al.  The social structure of schooling. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  William Tyler.  Complexity and Control: the organisational background of credentialism , 1982 .

[30]  Jeffrey R. Young.  When Professors Print Their Own Diplomas, Who Needs Universities?. , 2008 .

[31]  Thomas R. Wolanin.  The Student Credit Hour: An International Exploration. , 2003 .

[32]  Ross D. Boylan,et al.  The Effect of the Number of Diplomas on Their Value. , 1993 .

[33]  Kay Jordan Kohl,et al.  Postbaccalaureate Futures: New Markets, Resources, Credentials. American Council on Education/Oryx Press Series on Higher Education. , 2000 .

[34]  K. Vignare,et al.  ACCESS TO EDUCATION WITH ONLINE LEARNING AND OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES: CAN THEY CLOSE THE GAP? , 2008, Online Learning.

[35]  David B. Bills,et al.  CREDENTIALS AND CAPACITIES: Employers' Perceptions of The Aquisition of Skills , 1988 .

[36]  Thomas Ehrlich,et al.  How the student credit hour shapes higher education : the tie that binds , 2003 .

[37]  Mien Segers,et al.  Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features , 2009 .