Next-generation panel sequencing identifies NF1 germline mutations in three patients with pheochromocytoma but no clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1.

OBJECTIVE Our objective was to improve molecular diagnostics in patients with hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panel analysis. Derived from this study, we here present three cases that were diagnosed with NF1 germline mutations but did not have a prior clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). DESIGN We performed genetic analysis of known tumor predisposition genes, including NF1, using a multi-gene NGS enrichment-based panel applied to a total of 1029 PPGL patients. We did not exclude genes known to cause clinically defined syndromes such as NF1 based on missing phenotypic expression as is commonly practiced. METHODS Genetic analysis was performed using NGS (TruSight Cancer Panel/customized panel by Illumina) for analyzing patients' blood and tumor samples. Validation was carried out by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS Within our cohort, three patients, who were identified to carry pathogenic NF1 germline mutations, attracted attention, since none of the patients had a clinical suspicion of NF1 and one of them was initially suspected to have MEN2A syndrome due to co-occurrence of a medullary thyroid carcinoma. In these cases, one splice site, one stop and one frameshift mutation in NF1 were identified. CONCLUSIONS Since phenotypical presentation of NF1 is highly variable, we suggest analysis of the NF1 gene also in PPGL patients who do not meet diagnostic NF1 criteria. Co-occurrence of medullary thyroid carcinoma and PPGL was found to be a clinical decoy in NF1 diagnostics. These observations underline the value of multi-gene panel NGS for PPGL patients.

[1]  Vinod Gopalan,et al.  Review of sequencing platforms and their applications in phaeochromocytoma and paragangliomas. , 2017, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[2]  C. Lázaro,et al.  PheoSeq: A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Diagnostics. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[3]  B. Klink,et al.  Characteristics of Pediatric vs Adult Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas , 2017, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[4]  Jenny Welander,et al.  Consensus Statement on next-generation-sequencing-based diagnostic testing of hereditary phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas , 2017, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[5]  P. Hamet,et al.  Pheochromocytomas are diagnosed incidentally and at older age in neurofibromatosis type 1 , 2017, Clinical endocrinology.

[6]  D. Babovic‐Vuksanovic,et al.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 , 2017, Clinical endocrinology.

[7]  S. Khare,et al.  Germline mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in Asian Indian patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. , 2016, European journal of endocrinology.

[8]  S. Pinson,et al.  Interest of systematic screening of pheochromocytoma in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. , 2016, European journal of endocrinology.

[9]  E. Schröck,et al.  Identification and Functional Testing of ERCC2 Mutations in a Multi-national Cohort of Patients with Familial Breast- and Ovarian Cancer , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[10]  E. Schröck,et al.  An unusual case of Cowden syndrome associated with ganglioneuromatous polyposis , 2016, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[11]  B. Klink,et al.  Epigenetic Mutation of the Succinate Dehydrogenase C Promoter in a Patient With Two Paragangliomas. , 2016, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[12]  E. Schröck,et al.  HBOC multi-gene panel testing: comparison of two sequencing centers , 2015, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  Juan F. García,et al.  Whole-exome sequencing identifies MDH2 as a new familial paraganglioma gene. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  H. Neumann,et al.  Profiling of Somatic Mutations in Phaeochromocytoma and Paraganglioma by Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Analysis , 2015, International journal of endocrinology.

[15]  E. Pasmant,et al.  Neurofibromatosis type 1 molecular diagnosis: what can NGS do for you when you have a large gene with loss of function mutations? , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[16]  P. Rustin,et al.  Germline mutations in FH confer predisposition to malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[17]  P. Dahia Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma pathogenesis: learning from genetic heterogeneity , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[18]  C. Eng,et al.  Long-term prognosis of patients with pediatric pheochromocytoma. , 2013, Endocrine-related cancer.

[19]  P. Söderkvist,et al.  The NF1 gene: a frequent mutational target in sporadic pheochromocytomas and beyond. , 2013, Endocrine-related cancer.

[20]  E. Letouzé,et al.  Somatic NF1 inactivation is a frequent event in sporadic pheochromocytoma. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[21]  P. Söderkvist,et al.  Genetics and clinical characteristics of hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. , 2011, Endocrine-related cancer.

[22]  E. Maher,et al.  The genetics of phaeochromocytoma: using clinical features to guide genetic testing. , 2011, European journal of endocrinology.

[23]  J. Benítez,et al.  Exome sequencing identifies MAX mutations as a cause of hereditary pheochromocytoma , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[24]  L. Hofbauer,et al.  Is there still a place for adrenal venous sampling in the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma? , 2011, Endocrine.

[25]  L. Hofbauer,et al.  Measurements of plasma methoxytyramine, normetanephrine, and metanephrine as discriminators of different hereditary forms of pheochromocytoma. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[26]  Patricia L. M. Dahia,et al.  Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[27]  S. Douma,et al.  Neurofibromatosis type 1: should we screen for other genetic syndromes? A case report of co‐existence with multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A , 2009, European journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  B. Korf,et al.  Neurofibromatosis type 1. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[29]  F. Galateau-Sallé,et al.  PHD2 mutation and congenital erythrocytosis with paraganglioma. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  S. Filetti,et al.  Coincidence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 , 2008 .

[31]  D. Cooper,et al.  Mosaicism in sporadic neurofibromatosis type 1: variations on a theme common to other hereditary cancer syndromes? , 2008, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[32]  G. Arnaldi,et al.  Germline NF1 mutational spectra and loss-of-heterozygosity analyses in patients with pheochromocytoma and neurofibromatosis type 1. , 2007, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[33]  D. Evans,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 , 2006, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[34]  C. Eng,et al.  Comprehensive mutation scanning of NF1 in apparently sporadic cases of pheochromocytoma. , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[35]  P. Rustin,et al.  Hereditary Paraganglioma/Pheochromocytoma and Inherited Succinate Dehydrogenase Deficiency , 2005, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[36]  B. Dallapiccola,et al.  Novel and recurrent mutations in the NF1 gene in Italian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 , 2004, Human mutation.

[37]  C. Eng,et al.  The pressure rises: update on the genetics of phaeochromocytoma. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[38]  P. Choyke,et al.  Clinical and genetic characterization of pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau families: comparison with sporadic pheochromocytoma gives insight into natural history of pheochromocytoma. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[39]  S. Huson,et al.  Characterisation of germline mutations in the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene. , 1995, Journal of medical genetics.

[40]  Harold C. Sox,et al.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Geriatric Assessment Methods for Clinical Decision‐making , 1988 .

[41]  K. Nathanson,et al.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: understanding the complexities of the genetic background. , 2012, Cancer genetics.