Parameterization of a geometric flow implicit solvation model

Implicit solvent models are popular for their high computational efficiency and simplicity over explicit solvent models and are extensively used for computing molecular solvation properties. The accuracy of implicit solvent models depends on the geometric description of the solute‐solvent interface and the solvent dielectric profile that is defined near the surface of the solute molecule. Typically, it is assumed that the dielectric profile is spatially homogeneous in the bulk solvent medium and varies sharply across the solute‐solvent interface. However, the specific form of this profile is often described by ad hoc geometric models rather than physical solute‐solvent interactions. Hence, it is of significant interest to improve the accuracy of these implicit solvent models by more realistically defining the solute‐solvent boundary within a continuum setting. Recently, a differential geometry‐based geometric flow solvation model was developed, in which the polar and nonpolar free energies are coupled through a characteristic function that describes a smooth dielectric interface profile across the solvent–solute boundary in a thermodynamically self‐consistent fashion. The main parameters of the model are the solute/solvent dielectric coefficients, solvent pressure on the solute, microscopic surface tension, solvent density, and molecular force‐field parameters. In this work, we investigate how changes in the pressure, surface tension, solute dielectric coefficient, and choice of different force‐field charge and radii parameters affect the prediction accuracy for hydration free energies of 17 small organic molecules based on the geometric flow solvation model. The results of our study provide insights on the parameterization, accuracy, and predictive power of this new implicit solvent model. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  T. Straatsma,et al.  THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS , 1987 .

[2]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  J A McCammon,et al.  Coupling hydrophobicity, dispersion, and electrostatics in continuum solvent models. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[4]  B Honig,et al.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. , 1991, Science.

[5]  A. Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic effects in macromolecules: fundamental concepts and practical modeling. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  The non-polar solvent potential of mean force for the dimerization of alanine dipeptide: the role of solute-solvent van der Waals interactions. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.

[7]  J A McCammon,et al.  Computer simulation of protein-protein association kinetics: acetylcholinesterase-fasciculin. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[9]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Differential geometry based solvation model I: Eulerian formulation , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  C. Chothia,et al.  Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins , 1974, Nature.

[11]  Nathan A. Baker Biomolecular Applications of Poisson-Boltzmann Methods , 2005 .

[12]  J A McCammon,et al.  Coupling nonpolar and polar solvation free energies in implicit solvent models. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  R. Levy,et al.  Enthalpy−Entropy and Cavity Decomposition of Alkane Hydration Free Energies: Numerical Results and Implications for Theories of Hydrophobic Solvation , 2000 .

[14]  B. Roux,et al.  Implicit solvent models. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[15]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  The SAMP1 solvation challenge: further lessons regarding the pitfalls of parametrization. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  C. F. Curtiss,et al.  Molecular Theory Of Gases And Liquids , 1954 .

[17]  A. R. Zinsmeister,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building, by G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter , 1981 .

[18]  W. Im,et al.  Continuum solvation model: Computation of electrostatic forces from numerical solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation , 1998 .

[19]  Emilio Gallicchio,et al.  On the nonpolar hydration free energy of proteins: surface area and continuum solvent models for the solute-solvent interaction energy. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  J. Andrew Grant,et al.  SAMPL2 and continuum modeling , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[21]  Zhan Chen,et al.  Differential geometry based solvation model II: Lagrangian formulation , 2011, Journal of mathematical biology.

[22]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[23]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: the importance of dispersion and volume terms. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Andrew Grant,et al.  A smooth permittivity function for Poisson–Boltzmann solvation methods , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  H. C. Andersen,et al.  Role of Repulsive Forces in Determining the Equilibrium Structure of Simple Liquids , 1971 .

[26]  Guo-Wei Wei,et al.  Differential geometry based solvation model. III. Quantum formulation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[27]  David L Mobley,et al.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[29]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .

[30]  A. Bondi van der Waals Volumes and Radii , 1964 .

[31]  Malcolm E. Davis,et al.  Electrostatics in biomolecular structure and dynamics , 1990 .

[32]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Polarizable atomic multipole solutes in a Poisson-Boltzmann continuum. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Harianto Tjong,et al.  On the Dielectric Boundary in Poisson-Boltzmann Calculations. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  B Honig,et al.  Correlating solvation free energies and surface tensions of hydrocarbon solutes. , 1994, Biophysical chemistry.

[35]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predicting small-molecule solvation free energies: an informal blind test for computational chemistry. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.