Real-time change and damage detection of landslides and other earth movements threatening public infrastructure.

Geologic hazards such as coastal erosion, landslides, seismic loading, etc. constantly threaten public highway construction and maintenance. Repeat surveys using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS, ground-based LiDAR) enable rapid 3D data acquisition to map, see, analyze, and understand the processes generating such problems. Previously, change detection and analysis between scan surveys was conducted during post-processing upon return to the office, instead of while collecting data in the field. Change detection in the field improves the effectiveness and efficiency of the field investigation. We have developed a new algorithm that quickly geo-references scans upon field acquisition and simultaneously performs change detection by comparing these newly acquired scans to baseline models. This algorithm has been integrated with a simple, intuitive GUI that enables change detection to be completed quickly (<1min per scan) while data are being acquired in the field. This software has also been enhanced to ensure a productive workflow. Implementation and testing of the algorithm is underway at several sites that have been problematic for state agencies. Two test sites showing active movement are along Highway 101 in Oregon. These are the Spencer Creek Bridge site and the Johnson Creek landslide. An additional trial site is the US20 Pioneer-Eddyville highway realignment project, where several active landslides and surficial slope failures of embankment fill slopes have significantly disrupted construction efforts. Substantial baseline information at these sites was collected, which will be useful for future Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries studies. Performing change detection in the field offers several significant advantages to current post-processing workflows. First, field change detection serves as an augmented reality system, enabling field crews and researchers to see immediate results, on site, so that they are able to make key observations while present at the site, instead of being reliant on their personal memories or notes. Second, and importantly, it can improve the overall efficiency of the survey. When this information is available to the operator during field data acquisition, areas of minimal change can be quickly surveyed at coarser resolutions and areas of substantial change can be scanned at higher resolutions. This also translates into reduced processing time and data maintenance, which are currently significant hurdles for analyzing 3D laser scan datasets. Finally, this method provides immediate validation and quality control of the RTK GPS and laser scan data being collected, leading to more confidence in the acquired data and allowing any issues to be resolved directly in the field.

[1]  James Donovan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Digital Imaging for the Identification, Evaluation and Management of Unstable Highway Slopes , 2008 .

[2]  N. Sitar,et al.  Stability of Steep Slopes in Cemented Sands , 2011 .

[3]  R. Gutierrez,et al.  Comparison of short-term seacliff retreat measurement methods in Del Mar, California , 2009 .

[4]  S. Ashford,et al.  Quantifying sub-regional seacliff erosion using mobile terrestrial LIDAR , 2007 .

[5]  Marco Scaioni,et al.  APPLICATION OF TLS FOR CHANGE DETECTION IN ROCK FACES , 2009 .

[6]  Robert E. Kayen,et al.  Terrestrial-LIDAR Visualization of Surface and Structural Deformations of the 2004 Niigata Ken Chuetsu, Japan, Earthquake , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel Huber The ASTM E57 file format for 3D imaging data exchange , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  N. Sitar,et al.  Terrestrial LIDAR investigation of the December 2003 and January 2007 activations of the Northridge Bluff landslide, Daly City, California , 2007 .

[9]  D. Petley,et al.  Combined Digital Photogrammetry and Time‐of‐Flight Laser Scanning for Monitoring Cliff Evolution , 2005 .

[10]  George Vosselman,et al.  Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[11]  Michel JaboyedoffThierry Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review , 2012 .

[12]  Michael J. Olsen,et al.  A Wave of New Information: LIDAR Investigations of the 2009 Samoan Tsunami , 2011 .

[13]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning of Extended Cliff Sections in Dynamic Environments: Parameter Analysis , 2009 .

[14]  Antonio Galgaro,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanner to detect landslide displacement fields: a new approach , 2007 .

[15]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Recent Advances in Terrestrial Lidar Applications in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 2010 .

[16]  Nicholas J. Rosser,et al.  The integration of terrestrial laser scanning and numerical modelling in landslide investigations , 2010 .

[17]  Masashi Matsuoka,et al.  LIDAR-based change detection of buildings in dense urban areas , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[18]  Michel Jaboyedoff,et al.  Use of terrestrial laser scanning for the characterization of retrogressive landslides in sensitive clay and rotational landslides in river banks , 2009 .

[19]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Visual analysis for live LIDAR battlefield change detection , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Holly E. Rushmeier,et al.  The 3D Model Acquisition Pipeline , 2002, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[21]  William J. Burns,et al.  Protocol for inventory mapping of landslide deposits from light detection and ranging (lidar) imagery , 2009 .

[22]  Craig Glennie Kinematic Terrestrial Light-Detection and Ranging System for Scanning , 2009 .

[23]  M. Alba,et al.  FEASIBILITY AND PROBLEMS OF TLS IN MODELING ROCK FACES FOR HAZARD MAPPING , 2005 .

[24]  J. Trinder,et al.  AIRBORNE LIDAR AS A TOOL FOR DISASTER MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT , 2011 .

[25]  Volker Walter,et al.  Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection , 2004 .

[26]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Comparison of Airborne and Terrestrial Lidar Estimates of Seacliff Erosion in Southern California , 2010 .

[27]  R. Hack,et al.  Evaluation , and management of unstable rock slopes by 3-D laser scanning , 2006 .

[28]  J. Kemeny,et al.  Ground-based LiDAR : rock slope mapping and assessment , 2008 .

[29]  Anthony M. Rikli,et al.  Investigation of Straw Wattle Influence on Surficial Slope Stability , 2012 .

[30]  Marco Scaioni,et al.  Automatic Detection of Changes and Deformation In Rock Faces By Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2010 .

[31]  William H. Schulz,et al.  Landslide susceptibility revealed by LIDAR imagery and historical records, Seattle, Washington , 2007 .

[32]  Sarah Smith-Voysey,et al.  Geometric validation of a ground-based mobile laser scanning system , 2008 .

[33]  D. Petley,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning for monitoring the process of hard rock coastal cliff erosion , 2005, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[34]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.