A Density-Dependent Switch Drives Stochastic Clustering and Polarization of Signaling Molecules

Positive feedback plays a key role in the ability of signaling molecules to form highly localized clusters in the membrane or cytosol of cells. Such clustering can occur in the absence of localizing mechanisms such as pre-existing spatial cues, diffusional barriers, or molecular cross-linking. What prevents positive feedback from amplifying inevitable biological noise when an un-clustered “off” state is desired? And, what limits the spread of clusters when an “on” state is desired? Here, we show that a minimal positive feedback circuit provides the general principle for both suppressing and amplifying noise: below a critical density of signaling molecules, clustering switches off; above this threshold, highly localized clusters are recurrently generated. Clustering occurs only in the stochastic regime, suggesting that finite sizes of molecular populations cannot be ignored in signal transduction networks. The emergence of a dominant cluster for finite numbers of molecules is partly a phenomenon of random sampling, analogous to the fixation or loss of neutral mutations in finite populations. We refer to our model as the “neutral drift polarity model.” Regulating the density of signaling molecules provides a simple mechanism for a positive feedback circuit to robustly switch between clustered and un-clustered states. The intrinsic ability of positive feedback both to create and suppress clustering is a general mechanism that could operate within diverse biological networks to create dynamic spatial organization.

[1]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[2]  Hong Qian,et al.  Stochastic bistability and bifurcation in a mesoscopic signaling system with autocatalytic kinase. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Rong Li,et al.  Spontaneous cell polarization: undermining determinism , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Andrew D. Ellington,et al.  Widespread reorganization of metabolic enzymes into reversible assemblies upon nutrient starvation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Mark Kot,et al.  Elements of Mathematical Ecology: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[6]  Pico Caroni,et al.  Gap43, Marcks, and Cap23 Modulate Pi(4,5p)2 at Plasmalemmal Rafts, and Regulate Cell Cortex Actin Dynamics through a Common Mechanism , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  H. Rockoff On the Origins of , 2006 .

[8]  D. Murray,et al.  Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics , 2005, Nature.

[9]  M. Peter,et al.  Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 exchange factor Cdc24 by the PAK-like kinase Cla4 may regulate polarized growth in yeast. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[10]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Self-Organization of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Network Imaged with Super-Resolution Light Microscopy , 2009, PLoS biology.

[11]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  Mathematical biology , 1961, Connecticut medicine.

[12]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[13]  Jack Xin,et al.  A Critical Quantity for Noise Attenuation in Feedback Systems , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Thomas Gurry,et al.  Biophysical Mechanism for Ras-Nanocluster Formation and Signaling in Plasma Membrane , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  J. Hancock,et al.  Using plasma membrane nanoclusters to build better signaling circuits. , 2008, Trends in cell biology.

[16]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging of Signaling Molecules in Living Cells , 2000 .

[17]  H. Levine,et al.  Transient localized patterns in noise-driven reaction-diffusion systems. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[18]  Eugenio Marco,et al.  Endocytosis Optimizes the Dynamic Localization of Membrane Proteins that Regulate Cortical Polarity , 2007, Cell.

[19]  Roger Brent,et al.  Detailed Simulations of Cell Biology with Smoldyn 2.1 , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  J. Manley,et al.  Phosphorylation–dephosphorylation differentially affects activities of splicing factor ASF/SF2 , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Arnauld Sergé,et al.  Signalling complexes and clusters: functional advantages and methodological hurdles , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Keith Burridge,et al.  Regulation of RhoGTPase crosstalk, degradation and activity by RhoGDI1 , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Positive feedback regulation results in spatial clustering and fast spreading of active signaling molecules on a cell membrane. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  Y. Henis,et al.  Membrane Interactions of a Constitutively Active GFP-Ki-Ras 4B and Their Role in Signaling , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  James D. Murray Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[26]  L. Wahl,et al.  Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[28]  D. Drubin,et al.  Origins of Cell Polarity , 1996, Cell.

[29]  T. Kurtz Limit theorems for sequences of jump Markov processes approximating ordinary differential processes , 1971, Journal of Applied Probability.

[30]  A. Lamond,et al.  Nuclear speckles. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[31]  Steven P. Lalley,et al.  Critical scaling for the SIS stochastic epidemic , 2006, Journal of Applied Probability.

[32]  Robert G Parton,et al.  H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Andrew B Goryachev,et al.  Dynamics of Cdc42 network embodies a Turing‐type mechanism of yeast cell polarity , 2008, FEBS letters.

[35]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[36]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Interlinked Fast and Slow Positive Feedback Loops Drive Reliable Cell Decisions , 2005, Science.

[37]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[38]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Purely stochastic binary decisions in cell signaling models without underlying deterministic bistabilities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Jason M Haugh,et al.  Signal transduction at point-blank range: analysis of a spatial coupling mechanism for pathway crosstalk. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[40]  I. Nåsell The quasi-stationary distribution of the closed endemic sis model , 1996, Advances in Applied Probability.

[41]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[42]  Amy S. Gladfelter,et al.  Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[44]  A. Coniglio,et al.  Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[46]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Mathematical Model for Spatial Segregation of the Rho-Family GTPases Based on Inhibitory Crosstalk , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[47]  G. Vinnicombe,et al.  Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations , 2010, Nature.

[48]  Shuji Ishihara,et al.  A Mass Conserved Reaction–Diffusion System Captures Properties of Cell Polarity , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  W. Crocker,et al.  Polarity , 1910, Botanical Gazette.

[50]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Digital Signaling and Hysteresis Characterize Ras Activation in Lymphoid Cells , 2009, Cell.

[51]  Atul Narang,et al.  A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[53]  Brian D. Slaughter,et al.  Symmetry breaking in the life cycle of the budding yeast. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[54]  Ingemar Nåsell,et al.  The quasi-stationary distribution of the closed endemic sis model , 1996, Advances in Applied Probability.

[55]  Thomas Schmidt,et al.  Robust cell polarity is a dynamic state established by coupling transport and GTPase signaling , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[56]  Sigurd B. Angenent,et al.  On the spontaneous emergence of cell polarity , 2008, Nature.

[57]  Ofer Biham,et al.  Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[58]  Brian D. Slaughter,et al.  Dual modes of cdc42 recycling fine-tune polarized morphogenesis. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[59]  Eric Verdin,et al.  Reduced Mobility of the Alternate Splicing Factor (Asf) through the Nucleoplasm and Steady State Speckle Compartments , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[60]  Ankit Gupta,et al.  Stochastic model for cell polarity , 2010, 1003.1404.

[61]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Self-organization of the phosphatidylinositol lipids signaling system for random cell migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  T Misteli,et al.  Cell biology of transcription and pre-mRNA splicing: nuclear architecture meets nuclear function. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[63]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[64]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  A theory of biological pattern formation , 1972, Kybernetik.

[65]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[66]  David Michaelson,et al.  Differential Localization of Rho Gtpases in Live Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[67]  I. Nåsell,et al.  On the quasi-stationary distribution of the stochastic logistic epidemic. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[68]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.