The Saharan debris flow: an insight into the mechanics of long runout submarine debris flows

New 3·5 kHz profiles and a series of piston cores from the north-west African margin provide evidence that the Saharan debris flow travelled for more than 400 km on a highly fluid, low-friction layer of poorly sorted sediment. Data suggest that the Saharan debris flow is a two-phase event, consisting of a basal, volcaniclastic debris flow phase overlain by a pelagic debris flow phase. Both phases were emplaced on the lower continental rise by a single large debris flow at around 60 ka. The volcaniclastic flow left a thin deposit less than 5 m thick. This contrasts with the much thicker (over 25 m) deposit left by the pelagic debris flow phase. We suggest that pelagic sediment, sourced and mobilized as debris flow from the African continental margin, loaded and destabilized volcaniclastic material in the vicinity of the western Canaries. When subjected to this loading, the volcaniclastic material appears to have formed a highly fluid sandy debris flow, capable of transporting with it the huge volumes of pelagic debris, and contributing to a runout distance extending over 400 km downslope of the Canary Islands on slopes that decrease to as little as 0·05°. It is likely that the pelagic debris formed a thick impermeable slab above the volcanic debris, thus maintaining high pore pressures generated by loading and giving rise to low apparent friction conditions. The distribution of the two debris phases indicates that the volcaniclastic debris flow stopped within a few tens of kilometres after escaping from beneath the pelagic debris flow, probably because of dissipation of excess pore pressure when the seal of pelagic material was removed.

[1]  D. Hayes,et al.  Bathymetry, Microphysiography and Reflectivity Characteristics of the West African Margin Between Sierra Leone and Mauritania , 1982 .

[2]  N. Kenyon,et al.  The Storegga slide , 1988, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  R. Searle,et al.  Sonar acoustic facies and sediment distribution on an area of the deep ocean floor , 1985 .

[4]  N R Morgenstern,et al.  Submarine slumping and the initiation of turbidity currents , 1967 .

[5]  Robin T. Holcomb,et al.  Large landslides from oceanic volcanoes , 1991 .

[6]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  Undrained Loading, A Fundamental Mechanism of Mudflows and other Mass Movements , 1971 .

[7]  D. Masson,et al.  Flow processes and sediment deformation in the Canary Debris Flow on the NW African Continental Rise , 1997 .

[8]  D. Masson,et al.  Catastrophic collapse of the volcanic island of Hierro 15 ka ago and the history of landslides in the Canary Islands , 1996 .

[9]  G. Shanmugam High-Density Turbidity Currents: Are They Sandy Debris Flows?: PERSPECTIVES , 1996 .

[10]  A. Kuijpers,et al.  Climatic control of turbidite deposition on the Madeira Abyssal Plain , 1983, Nature.

[11]  R. Simm,et al.  Turbidity-current and debris-flow pathways to the Cape Verde Basin: status of long-range side-scan sonar (GLORIA) surveys , 1987, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[12]  R. L. Shreve,et al.  The Blackhawk Landslide , 1968 .

[13]  P. Weaver Determination of turbidity current erosional characteristics from reworked coccolith assemblages, Canary Basin, north‐east Atlantic , 1994 .

[14]  J. Damuth,et al.  Echo character of the East Brazilian continental margin and its relationship to sedimentary processes , 1977 .

[15]  J. N. Hutchinson A sliding–consolidation model for flow slides , 1986 .

[16]  D. Hayes,et al.  Northwest African Continental Rise: Effects of Near-Bottom Processes Inferred from High-Resolution Seismic Data , 1992 .

[17]  Ralph O. Kehle,et al.  Physical Processes in Geology , 1972 .

[18]  B. Voight,et al.  Lessons from Ontake-san: A comparative analysis of debris avalanche dynamics , 1994 .

[19]  R. Simm,et al.  Submarine debris flow deposits detected by long-range side-scan sonar 1,000-kilometers from source , 1983 .

[20]  J. Major Depositional Processes in Large‐Scale Debris‐Flow Experiments , 1997, The Journal of Geology.

[21]  D. Masson,et al.  A giant landslide on the north flank of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 1995 .

[22]  D. Brunsden,et al.  The surface texture of the Saharan Debris Flow deposit and some speculations on submarine debris flow processes , 1993 .

[23]  R. Jacobi Sediment slides on the northwestern continental margin of Africa , 1976 .

[24]  H. J. Melosh,et al.  The physics of very large landslides , 1986 .

[25]  R. Iverson,et al.  U. S. Geological Survey , 1967, Radiocarbon.

[26]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Late Quaternary sedimentation off the western Sahara , 1976 .

[27]  H. Norem,et al.  An approach to the physics and the modeling of submarine flowslides , 1990 .

[28]  Kyoji Sassa,et al.  Geotechnical model for the motion of landslides , 1988 .

[29]  R. Embley The role of mass transport in the distribution and character of deep-ocean sediments with special reference to the North Atlantic , 1980 .

[30]  M. Hampton Competence of Fine-grained Debris Flows , 1975 .

[31]  Brann Johnson Chapter 14 - Blackhawk Landslide, California, U.S.A. , 1978 .

[32]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  The debris of the Frank Slide and theories of rockslide–avalanche mobility , 1986 .

[33]  R. Embley New evidence for occurrence of debris flow deposits in the deep sea , 1976 .

[34]  J. Damuth Echo character of the western equatorial Atlantic floor and its relationship to the dispersal and distribution of terrigenous sediments , 1975 .

[35]  R. Embley Anatomy of Some Atlantic Margin Sediment Slides and Some Comments on Ages and Mechanisms , 1982 .

[36]  P. Weaver,et al.  Saharan Continental Rise: Facies Distribution and Sediment Slides , 1992 .