Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect

Priming from repeated distractor sets, or search context, in conjunctive visual search was examined in four patients with hemispatial neglect. In the first experiment overall context was either changed or repeated while the target was always the same to control for any modulatory effect of target priming. Considerable priming was seen from repeated context. In the second experiment the context was either repeated on the left side, on the right side, on both sides, or the context was new. Priming from repeated context was found to arise from the left visual field, as well as the right visual field, as well as when overall context was repeated. Brief masked displays were used in experiment 3, the results again showing strong priming from repeated overall context. The results of the three experiments suggest that visual grouping, or perceptual organization, of distractor sets is relatively intact in the affected hemifield of parietal neglect patients. Furthermore, repetition of context may even temporarily ameliorate neglect symptoms in search. These findings are consistent with claims that grouping is distinct from attentional processing and that it operates at lower levels of the perceptual hierarchy.

[1]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .

[2]  J. Driver,et al.  New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  U. Neisser Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. , 1963 .

[4]  H. Müller,et al.  Cross-trial priming in visual search for singleton conjunction targets: Role of repeated target and distractor features , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[7]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[8]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[9]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[10]  G Gainotti,et al.  Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[12]  Michael Erb,et al.  Exploring the visual world: The neural substrate of spatial orienting , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Visual search and its disorders , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[14]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[15]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[16]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .

[17]  Chris Rorden,et al.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[19]  I. McManus Charles Dickens: a neglected diagnosis , 2001, The Lancet.

[20]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[21]  C. Kennard,et al.  Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Yuka Sasaki,et al.  Processing local signals into global patterns , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Preattentive Filling-in of Visual Surfaces in Parietal Extinction , 1997, Science.

[24]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming in visual search: Context effects, target repetition effects, and role-reversal effects , 2005 .

[25]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Parietal neglect and visual awareness , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. P. Cavanagh,et al.  The equivalence of target and nontarget processing in visual search , 1971 .

[27]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[28]  G. Ettlinger,et al.  Unilateral spatial neglect and defective performance in one half of space. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  AÂ rni KristjaÂnsson Rapid learning in attention shifts : A review , 2005 .

[31]  S. Ferber,et al.  Revisiting unilateral neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  J. Driver,et al.  Implicit Processing and Learning of Visual Stimuli in Parietal Extinction and Neglect , 2001, Cortex.

[34]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  Á. Kristjánsson Surface Assignment Modulates Object Formation for Visual Short-Term Memory , 2006 .

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  J. Driver,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Evoked Potential Correlates of Conscious and Unconscious Vision in Parietal Extinction Patients , 2001, NeuroImage.

[38]  Arni Kristjansson,et al.  Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  S. Ferber,et al.  Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe , 2001, Nature.

[41]  Á. Kristjánsson Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task , 2006, Vision Research.

[42]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[43]  B. J. Casey,et al.  The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[44]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect , 2003 .

[45]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Hemispatial Neglect and Visual Search: A Large Scale Analysis , 2004, Cortex.

[46]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Hemispace and Hemispatial Neglect , 1987 .

[47]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[48]  R. Rafal,et al.  "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual Priming for Object Detection , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[50]  Pia Rotshtein,et al.  On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Árni Kristjánsson,et al.  Priming of Color and Position during Visual Search in Unilateral Spatial Neglect , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Á. Kristjánsson Surface assignment modulates object formation for visual short-term memory. , 2004, Perception.

[53]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[55]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Searching with Unilateral Neglect , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  B. J. Casey,et al.  A developmental fMRI study of attentional conflict , 2001, NeuroImage.

[58]  Gazzaniga,et al.  29 Short-Term Memory for the Rapid Deployment of Visual Attention , 2004 .

[59]  Árni Kristjánsson,et al.  Rapid learning in attention shifts: A review , 2006 .

[60]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[62]  C. Olivers,et al.  On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven , 2006 .

[63]  P Vuilleumier,et al.  Neural response to emotional faces with and without awareness: event-related fMRI in a parietal patient with visual extinction and spatial neglect , 2002, Neuropsychologia.