Spectral motion produces an auditory after-effect

DISTORTIONS of perception following prolonged exposure to an unvarying sensory stimulus have been observed since at least the third century BC1. The motion after-effect is a familiar experience2 in which, after a few minutes of viewing objects moving in a single direction, a stationary object appears to move in the opposite direction. Similar after-effects have been observed for many visual stimuli, including tilted lines, colours, stereoscopic depth, curvature, spatial frequency, contrast, rotation and motion in depth3–9. In contrast to the rich variety of visual after-effects reported since the 1960s, reports of analogous auditory adaptation effects only appeared in the 1970s10–12, but have continued since then13,14. Some effects of sound source spatial movement perception after adaptation to a spatially moving sound source have been reported15. Here we report an auditory perceptual after-effect analogous to the visual motion after-effect, which is caused by adaptation to auditory spectral (frequency) motion. After a few minutes of listening to a simple spectral pattern moving upwards or downwards in frequency space, the same pattern sounds as though it is drifting in the opposite direction when it is stationary. The effect shows binaural transfer, implying that it is generated at the level after binaural interaction. After-effects produced by the motion of spectral peaks are independent of those produced by spectral notches, suggesting separate processing channels for spectral peaks and notches.

[1]  P. Jeffrey Bloom,et al.  Creating Source Elevation Illusions by Spectral Manipulation , 1976 .

[2]  J. Harris,et al.  Movement aftereffects contingent on the colour or pattern of a stationary surround , 1975, Vision Research.

[3]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  Detection and discrimination of spectral peaks and notches at 1 and 8 kHz. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Movement aftereffects contingent on color, intensity, and pattern , 1972 .

[5]  R B Gardner,et al.  Evidence for direction-specific channels in the processing of frequency modulation. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Anstis,et al.  Visual Adaptation to Gradual Change of Intensity , 1967, Science.

[7]  R. Butler,et al.  The spatial attributes of stimulus frequency in the median sagittal plane and their role in sound localization. , 1983, American journal of otolaryngology.

[8]  O. Favreau Motion aftereffects: Evidence for parallel processing in motion perception , 1976, Vision Research.

[9]  D. Grantham Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Aftereffect of Seen Motion with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1963, Science.

[11]  R. Kay Hearing of modulation in sounds. , 1982, Physiological reviews.

[12]  D Regan,et al.  Selective adaptation to frequency-modulated tones: evidence for an information-processing channel selectively sensitive to frequency changes. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[14]  R. Kay,et al.  On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency‐modulated tones , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  James T. Walker A texture-contingent visual motion aftereffect , 1972 .

[16]  M. Cynader,et al.  Sensitivity of cat primary auditory cortex (Al) neurons to the direction and rate of frequency modulation , 1985, Brain Research.