Impact of measurement noise, experimental design, and estimation methods on Modular Response Analysis based network reconstruction

Modular Response Analysis (MRA) is a method to reconstruct signalling networks from steady-state perturbation data which has frequently been used in different settings. Since these data are usually noisy due to multi-step measurement procedures and biological variability, it is important to investigate the effect of this noise onto network reconstruction. Here we present a systematic study to investigate propagation of noise from concentration measurements to network structures. Therefore, we design an in silico study of the MAPK and the p53 signalling pathways with realistic noise settings. We make use of statistical concepts and measures to evaluate accuracy and precision of individual inferred interactions and resulting network structures. Our results allow to derive clear recommendations to optimize the performance of MRA based network reconstruction: First, large perturbations are favorable in terms of accuracy even for models with non-linear steady-state response curves. Second, a single control measurement for different perturbation experiments seems to be sufficient for network reconstruction, and third, we recommend to execute the MRA workflow with the mean of different replicates for concentration measurements rather than using computationally more involved regression strategies.

[1]  Tapesh Santra,et al.  Integrating Bayesian variable selection with Modular Response Analysis to infer biochemical network topology , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[2]  Sean C. Taylor,et al.  The Design of a Quantitative Western Blot Experiment , 2014, BioMed research international.

[3]  Mia Hubert,et al.  MATLAB library LIBRA , 2010 .

[4]  Boris N. Kholodenko,et al.  Signalling ballet in space and time , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[5]  Boris N. Kholodenko,et al.  On the personalised modelling of cancer signalling , 2016 .

[6]  Sebastian Bohl,et al.  Computational processing and error reduction strategies for standardized quantitative data in biological networks , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[7]  Jens Timmer,et al.  An error model for protein quantification , 2007, Bioinform..

[8]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Inference of signaling and gene regulatory networks by steady-state perturbation experiments: structure and accuracy. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Bertram Klinger,et al.  Reverse engineering a hierarchical regulatory network downstream of oncogenic KRAS , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  H. Resat,et al.  EGFR signaling pathways are wired differently in normal 184A1L5 human mammary epithelial and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells , 2017, Journal of cell communication and signaling.

[11]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  M. Hubert,et al.  A Robust Measure of Skewness , 2004 .

[13]  Diego di Bernardo,et al.  Inference of gene regulatory networks and compound mode of action from time course gene expression profiles , 2006, Bioinform..

[14]  A. Cann Replication , 2003, Principles of Molecular Virology.

[15]  Jeremy E. Purvis,et al.  p53 Dynamics Control Cell Fate , 2012, Science.

[16]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Determination of Functional Network Structure from Local Parameter Dependence Data , 2002, physics/0205003.

[18]  Tapesh Santra,et al.  Reconstructing static and dynamic models of signaling pathways using Modular Response Analysis , 2018, Current Opinion in Systems Biology.

[19]  Martin Krzywinski,et al.  Points of Significance: Replication , 2014, Nature Methods.

[20]  Mia Hubert,et al.  Robust measures of tail weight , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[21]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  H. Shankaran,et al.  Integrated analysis reveals that STAT3 is central to the crosstalk between HER/ErbB receptor signaling pathways in human mammary epithelial cells. , 2015, Molecular bioSystems.

[23]  Yi Li,et al.  Discriminating direct and indirect connectivities in biological networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Nicole Radde,et al.  Normalization of Western blot data affects the statistics of estimators , 2016 .