Principal Component Analysis to Determine the Surface Properties That Influence the Self-Cleaning Action of Hydrophobic Plant Leaves.

It is well established that many leaf surfaces display self-cleaning properties. However, an understanding of how the surface properties interact is still not achieved. Consequently, 12 different leaf types were selected for analysis due to their water repellency and self-cleaning properties. The most hydrophobic surfaces demonstrated splitting of the νs CH2 and ν CH2 bands, ordered platelet-like structures, crystalline waxes, high-surface-roughness values, high-total-surface-free energy and apolar components of surface energy, and low polar and Lewis base components of surface energy. The surfaces that exhibited the least roughness and high polar and Lewis base components of surface energy had intracuticular waxes, yet they still demonstrated the self-cleaning action. Principal component analysis demonstrated that the most hydrophobic species shared common surface chemistry traits with low intra-class variability, while the less hydrophobic leaves had highly variable surface-chemistry characteristics. Despite this, we have shown through partial least squares regression that the leaf water contact angle (i.e., hydrophobicity) can be predicted using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy surface chemistry data with excellent ability. This is the first time that such a statistical analysis has been performed on a complex biological system. This model could be utilized to investigate and predict the water contact angles of a range of biological surfaces. An understanding of the interplay of properties is extremely important to produce optimized biomimetic surfaces.

[1]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Self-Cleaning of Hydrophobic Rough Surfaces by Coalescence-Induced Wetting Transition. , 2018, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  K. Whitehead,et al.  Production of hybrid macro/micro/nano surface structures on Ti6Al4V surfaces by picosecond laser surface texturing and their antifouling characteristics. , 2017, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[3]  T. Darmanin,et al.  A travel in the Echeveria genus wettability's world , 2017 .

[4]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Plant Surfaces: Structures and Functions for Biomimetic Innovations , 2017, Nano-micro letters.

[5]  Huixia Wang,et al.  The Effects of Leaf Roughness, Surface Free Energy and Work of Adhesion on Leaf Water Drop Adhesion , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Zhiguang Guo,et al.  Interfacial effects of superhydrophobic plant surfaces: A review , 2014 .

[7]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Hierarchically structured superhydrophobic flowers with low hysteresis of the wild pansy (Viola tricolor) – new design principles for biomimetic materials , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[8]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Superhydrophobicity in perfection: the outstanding properties of the lotus leaf , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[9]  L. A. Smith,et al.  The detection and influence of food soils on microorganisms on stainless steel using scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy. , 2010, International journal of food microbiology.

[10]  Jesús Picó,et al.  Data understanding with PCA: Structural and Variance Information plots , 2010 .

[11]  C. Pipper,et al.  [''R"--project for statistical computing]. , 2008, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[12]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces: multiscale approach. , 2007, Nano letters.

[13]  F. Mirabella Principles, Theory and Practice of Internal Reflection Spectroscopy , 2006 .

[14]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces , 2006 .

[15]  R. Jetter,et al.  Leaf cuticular waxes are arranged in chemically and mechanically distinct layers: evidence from Prunus laurocerasus L. , 2000 .

[16]  H. Busscher,et al.  Role of acid-base interactions on the adhesion of oral streptococci and actinomyces to hexadecane and chloroform - influence of divalent cations and comparison between free energies of partitioning and free energies obtained by extended DLVO analysis , 1999 .

[17]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[18]  C. J. Oss Hydrophobicity of biosurfaces — Origin, quantitative determination and interaction energies , 1995 .

[19]  R. F. Giese,et al.  The Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity of Clay Minerals , 1995 .

[20]  G. Berlyn,et al.  A comparison of foliar wettability of red spruce and balsam fir* growing at high elevation , 1991 .

[21]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfaces , 1986 .

[22]  C. Jones,et al.  RAPID QUANTIFICATION OF SPINACH LEAF CUTICULAR WAX USING FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED ATTENUATED TOTAL REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY , 2013 .

[23]  G. Neuner,et al.  Leaf wettability decreases along an extreme altitudinal gradient , 2009, Oecologia.

[24]  Beatriz Ribeiro da Luz,et al.  Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy of plant leaves: a tool for ecological and botanical studies. , 2006, The New phytologist.