A comparison of thin-plate splines with automatic correspondences and B-splines with uniform grids for multimodal prostate registration

This paper provides a comparison of spline-based registration methods applied to register interventional Trans Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS) and pre-acquired Magnetic Resonance (MR) prostate images for needle guided prostate biopsy. B-splines and Thin-plate Splines (TPS) are the most prevalent spline-based approaches to achieve deformable registration. Pertaining to the strategic selection of correspondences for the TPS registration, we use an automatic method already proposed in our previous work to generate correspondences in the MR and US prostate images. The method exploits the prostate geometry with the principal components of the segmented prostate as the underlying framework and involves a triangulation approach. The correspondences are generated with successive refinements and Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) is employed to determine the optimal number of correspondences required to achieve TPS registration. B-spline registration with successive grid refinements are consecutively applied for a significant comparison of the impact of the strategically chosen correspondences on the TPS registration against the uniform B-spline control grids. The experimental results are validated on 4 patient datasets. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) is used as a measure of the registration accuracy. Average DSC values of 0.97±0.01 and 0.95±0.03 are achieved for the TPS and B-spline registrations respectively. B-spline registration is observed to be more computationally expensive than the TPS registration with average execution times of 128.09 ± 21.7 seconds and 62.83 ± 32.77 seconds respectively for images with maximum width of 264 pixels and a maximum height of 211 pixels.

[1]  P. Choyke,et al.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  Fabrice Mériaudeau,et al.  A Thin-Plate Spline Based Multimodal Prostate Registration with Optimal Correspondences , 2010, 2010 Sixth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet Based Systems.

[3]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  P. Carroll,et al.  Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy , 2003 .

[5]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[6]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for brachytherapy , 2006, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[7]  Fujio Yamaguchi,et al.  Curves and Surfaces in Computer Aided Geometric Design , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[10]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  David R. Forsey,et al.  Hierarchical B-spline refinement , 1988, SIGGRAPH.

[12]  Fumihiko Ino,et al.  A data distributed parallel algorithm for nonrigid image registration , 2005, Parallel Comput..

[13]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  Peter Guion,et al.  Initial clinical experience with real‐time transrectal ultrasonography‐magnetic resonance imaging fusion‐guided prostate biopsy , 2008, BJU international.

[15]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Fabrice Mériaudeau,et al.  Texture Guided Active Appearance Model Propagation for Prostate Segmentation , 2010, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[17]  B. Krauskopf,et al.  Proc of SPIE , 2003 .