Symbolic signatures for deformable shapes

Recognizing classes of objects from their shape is an unsolved problem in machine vision that entails the ability of a computer system to represent and generalize complex geometrical information on the basis of a finite amount of prior data. A practical approach to this problem is particularly difficult to implement, not only because the shape variability of relevant object classes is generally large, but also because standard sensing devices used to capture the real world only provide a partial view of a scene, so there is partial information pertaining to the objects of interest. In this work, we develop an algorithmic framework for recognizing classes of deformable shapes from range data. The basic idea of our component-based approach is to generalize existing surface representations that have proven effective in recognizing specific 3D objects to the problem of object classes using our newly introduced symbolic-signature representation that is robust to deformations, as opposed to a numeric representation that is often tied to a specific shape. Based on this approach, we present a system that is capable of recognizing and classifying a variety of object shape classes from range data. We demonstrate our system in a series of large-scale experiments that were motivated by specific applications in scene analysis and medical diagnosis.

[1]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[2]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[3]  J. Allanson,et al.  Handbook of Normal Physical Measurements , 1989 .

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active shape models , 1998 .

[5]  Gabriel Taubin,et al.  Estimating the tensor of curvature of a surface from a polyhedral approximation , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[7]  K. Jones,et al.  Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation , 1996 .

[8]  F. Bookstein Shape and the information in medical images: a decade of the morphometric synthesis , 1997, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[9]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Control of Polygonal Mesh Resolution for 3-D Computer Vision , 1998, Graph. Model. Image Process..

[10]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[11]  J. C. BurgesChristopher A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998 .

[12]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Characterization of Neuropathological Shape Deformations , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with kernels , 1998 .

[14]  Sven Loncaric,et al.  A survey of shape analysis techniques , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Matthew Turk,et al.  A Morphable Model For The Synthesis Of 3D Faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Maximum Entropy Discrimination , 1999, NIPS.

[17]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  Andrew E. Johnson,et al.  Using Spin Images for Efficient Object Recognition in Cluttered 3D Scenes , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Sven Kreiborg,et al.  Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Polina Golland,et al.  Discriminative Direction for Kernel Classifiers , 2001, NIPS.

[21]  Polina Golland,et al.  Statistical shape analysis of anatomical structures , 2001 .

[22]  Colin Campbell,et al.  Bayes Point Machines , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[23]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Categorization by Learning and Combining Object Parts , 2001, NIPS.

[24]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with kernels , 2001 .

[25]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[26]  S. Lele,et al.  An Invariant Approach to Statistical Analysis of Shapes , 2001 .

[27]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Matching 3D models with shape distributions , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[28]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Steve Capell,et al.  A multiresolution framework for dynamic deformations , 2002, SCA '02.

[30]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  A search engine for 3D models , 2003, TOGS.

[31]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  A new paradigm for recognizing 3-D objects from range data , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[33]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  A Reflective Symmetry Descriptor for 3D Models , 2003, Algorithmica.

[34]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Discriminating Deformable Shape Classes , 2003, NIPS.

[35]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[36]  Christian R. Shelton,et al.  Morphable Surface Models , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.