NMRCloudQ: a quantum cloud experience on a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer.

As of today, no one can tell when a universal quantum computer with thousands of logical quantum bits (qubits) will be built. At present, most quantum computer prototypes involve less than ten individually controllable qubits, and only exist in laboratories for the sake of either the great costs of devices or professional maintenance requirements. Moreover, scientists believe that quantum computers will never replace our daily, every-minute use of classical computers, but would rather serve as a substantial addition to the classical ones when tackling some particular problems. Due to the above two reasons, cloud-based quantum computing is anticipated to be the most useful and reachable form for public users to experience with the power of quantum. As initial attempts, IBM Q has launched influential cloud services on a superconducting quantum processor in 2016, but no other platforms has followed up yet. Here, we report our new cloud quantum computing service -- NMRCloudQ (this http URL), where nuclear magnetic resonance, one of the pioneer platforms with mature techniques in experimental quantum computing, plays as the role of implementing computing tasks. Our service provides a comprehensive software environment preconfigured with a list of quantum information processing packages, and aims to be freely accessible to either amateurs that look forward to keeping pace with this quantum era or professionals that are interested in carrying out real quantum computing experiments in person. In our current version, four qubits are already usable with in average 1.26% single-qubit gate error rate and 1.77% two-qubit controlled-NOT gate error rate via randomized benchmaking tests. Improved control precisions as well as a new seven-qubit processor are also in preparation and will be available later.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Daniel Nigg,et al.  Experimental Repetitive Quantum Error Correction , 2011, Science.

[3]  E. Knill,et al.  EFFECTIVE PURE STATES FOR BULK QUANTUM COMPUTATION , 1997, quant-ph/9706053.

[4]  N. Gershenfeld,et al.  Bulk Spin-Resonance Quantum Computation , 1997, Science.

[5]  S. Girvin,et al.  Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[6]  Jiangfeng Du,et al.  Experimental fault-tolerant universal quantum gates with solid-state spins under ambient conditions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[7]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[8]  J. Emerson,et al.  Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators , 2005, quant-ph/0503243.

[9]  Jan Meijer,et al.  High-fidelity spin entanglement using optimal control , 2013, Nature Communications.

[10]  K. K. Nambiar,et al.  Foundations of Computer Science , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[11]  R. Laflamme,et al.  Randomized benchmarking of single- and multi-qubit control in liquid-state NMR quantum information processing , 2008, 0808.3973.

[12]  Thomas Lippert,et al.  Benchmarking gate-based quantum computers , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[13]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: an experimentally accessible paradigm for quantum computing , 1997, quant-ph/9709001.

[14]  Jens Koch,et al.  Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[15]  Y. Wang,et al.  Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register , 2013, Nature.

[16]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy , 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[17]  John Darzentas,et al.  Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization , 1983 .

[18]  Jonathan A. Jones Quantum computing with NMR. , 2010, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

[19]  S. Glaser,et al.  Second order gradient ascent pulse engineering. , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[20]  Jun Li,et al.  Experimental estimation of average fidelity of a Clifford gate on a 7-qubit quantum processor. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[21]  Raymond Laflamme,et al.  Coherent control of two nuclear spins using the anisotropic hyperfine interaction. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[22]  R. Martinez,et al.  An algorithmic benchmark for quantum information processing , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Observations of quantum dynamics by solution-state NMR spectroscopy , 1999, quant-ph/9905061.

[24]  I. Chuang,et al.  Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance , 2001, Nature.

[25]  C. F. Roos,et al.  Optimal control of entangling operations for trapped-ion quantum computing , 2008, 0809.1414.

[26]  E. Knill,et al.  Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates , 2007, 0707.0963.

[27]  Stefan Volkwein,et al.  Formulation and numerical solution of finite-level quantum optimal control problems , 2008 .

[28]  J M Gambetta,et al.  Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[29]  Gui-Lu Long,et al.  Experimental quantum Hamiltonian identification from measurement time traces. , 2014, Science bulletin.

[30]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[31]  Jonathan A. Jones,et al.  Implementation of a quantum search algorithm on a quantum computer , 1998, Nature.

[32]  Simon J. Devitt,et al.  Performing Quantum Computing Experiments in the Cloud , 2016, 1605.05709.

[33]  Timo O. Reiss,et al.  Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[34]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[35]  F. K. Wilhelm,et al.  Optimized controlled-Z gates for two superconducting qubits coupled through a resonator , 2013, 1306.6894.

[36]  L. Vandersypen,et al.  NMR techniques for quantum control and computation , 2004, quant-ph/0404064.

[37]  Hang Li,et al.  Experimental Study of Forrelation in Nuclear Spins , 2016, Science bulletin.