This paper combines the imperfect reliability model of Bala and Goyal [2000b] with the heterogeneous player model of Galeottiet al.[2006]. We compare existence, characterization and efficiency results in the resulting framework with the results in other frameworks allowing for imperfect reliability or heterogeneity. Specifically, we compare our work with the framework of Haller and Sarangi [2005] which allows for heterogeneity in link reliability but assumes that players are homogeneous. We find, by contrast with their paper, that non existence of Nash networks is possible in our framework even if the population is very small. Moreover, although the incentives of players to maintain (or delete) links are different, in both frameworks there exist parameters such that every essential network is strict Nash and efficient. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
[1]
Daniel A. Hojman,et al.
Core and Periphery in Endogenous Networks
,
2006
.
[2]
Sanjeev Goyal,et al.
Network Formation with Heterogeneous Players
,
2002,
Games Econ. Behav..
[3]
Sanjeev Goyal,et al.
A strategic analysis of network reliability
,
2000
.
[4]
Sanjeev Goyal,et al.
A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation
,
2000
.
[5]
K. De Jaegher,et al.
Two-Way Flow Networks with Small Decay
,
2010
.
[6]
Confirming information flows in networks
,
2013
.
[7]
Hans Haller,et al.
Nash networks with heterogeneous links
,
2005,
Math. Soc. Sci..
[8]
Hans Haller,et al.
Nash Networks with Heterogeneous Agents
,
2000
.
[9]
Sudipta Sarangi,et al.
(Non-)existence and Scope of Nash Networks
,
2007
.