FR-IQA - Permutation Entropy Deviation Index

In this work, a new objective image quality assessment (IQA) framework, based on the working principle of permutation entropy (PE) is proposed. The framework is titled as Permutation Entropy Deviation Index (PEDI). The idea is to design an IQA framework that should be highly accurate as well as computationally efficient; making it viable to be used with different image processing applications, for visual quality assessments. The proposed model make use of the PE that helps in detecting and visualizing changes related to structures with correlation between successive samples instead of considering magnitudes of the signal. Thus, the proposed approach uses this property to efficiently predict image quality. The PE exploits the global variations in the local quality map for image quality assessment. With standard deviation as the pooling strategy, it is noted that permutation entropy between reference and distorted images can predict image quality with high measures of accuracy. Experimental results on subjective database, CSIQ, have shown that the proposed model outperforms most of existing SOTA image quality assessment models and highly correlates with subjective judgements.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Perceptual distortion metric for digital color video , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Pavan Kumar Kankar,et al.  Bearing fault diagnosis based on multi-scale permutation entropy and adaptive neuro fuzzy classifier , 2015 .

[5]  Zhenhu Liang,et al.  Multiscale permutation entropy analysis of EEG recordings during sevoflurane anesthesia , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  C. Finney,et al.  A review of symbolic analysis of experimental data , 2003 .

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Zhong Liu,et al.  Perceptual image quality assessment using a geometric structural distortion model , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Modern Image Quality Assessment , 2006, Modern Image Quality Assessment.

[12]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  Bernd Girod,et al.  What's wrong with mean-squared error? , 1993 .

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  B. Pompe,et al.  Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[16]  Chun-Ling Yang,et al.  Gradient-Based Structural Similarity for Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[17]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.