Toward creating an environment of cooperation between water, energy, and food stakeholders in San Antonio.

The San Antonio Region is home to a rapidly growing population with developing energy and agricultural sectors competing for water, land, and financial resources. Despite the tight interconnectedness between water, energy, and food challenges, little is known about the levels of communication and coordination among the various officials responsible for making the decisions that affect the management and planning of the three resource systems. It has been postulated that efficient communication is a prerequisite to developing resource allocation strategies that avoid potential unintended negative consequences that could result from inefficient allocation of natural resources and competing demands. Factors that may impact communication are identified and their potential roles are considered in improving existing levels of communication between San Antonio's water officials and those at other energy, food, and water institutions in the San Antonio Region. A questionnaire designed to gather information on stakeholder concerns, frequency of communication, and participation in engagement forums was sent to public water officials in the Region. Using social network analysis and bivariate Ordinary Least Square regression analysis, the authors conclude that while modest levels of communication exist among water institutions, a very low level of communication exists between water institutions and those responsible for food and energy. It was further concluded that the frequency of communication among officials at different water institutions is higher among those that participated in stakeholder engagement activities. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that participation in stakeholder engagement activities improves communication frequency between water stakeholders and those in the food and energy sectors. There is also insufficient evidence to conclude that people at water institutions in San Antonio would have a higher frequency of communication with other water, energy, and food stakeholder in correlation with a higher level of concern about future water availability in the Region.

[1]  K. Lebacqz.  Six Theories of Justice: Perspectives from Philosophical and Theological Ethics , 1986 .

[2]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[3]  Carol W. Lewis.  The Ethics Challenge in Public Service: A Problem-Solving Guide , 1991 .

[4]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[5]  M. Kurian.  The water-energy-food nexus: Trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development , 2017 .

[6]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[7]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[8]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Understanding What Shapes a Polycentric Governance System , 2016 .

[9]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[10]  Robin Grimble,et al.  Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities , 1997 .

[11]  J. Newig,et al.  Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? , 2009 .

[12]  R. Brugha,et al.  A stakeholder analysis. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[13]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Scale and Governance: Conceptual Considerations and Practical Implications , 2011 .

[14]  F. Lyon,et al.  Transdisciplinary environmental research : a review of approaches to knowledge co-production , 2015 .

[15]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Stakeholders on Sustainability Marketing Strategy of Indian Companies , 2016 .

[16]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Network Capital in a Multi-level World: Getting Support in Personal Communities , 2001 .

[17]  A. Vedlitz,et al.  Awareness of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus and Public Policy Support in the United States: Public Attitudes Among the American People , 2018 .

[18]  Zillur Rahman,et al.  Sustainability Marketing Strategy: An Analysis of Recent Literature , 2013 .

[19]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .

[20]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[21]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[22]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: A multi-level coordination challenge , 2017, Environmental Science & Policy.

[23]  E. Ostrom.  Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework , 2011 .

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Rabi H. Mohtar,et al.  Beyond zero sum game allocations: expanding resources potentials through reduced interdependencies and increased resource nexus synergies , 2017 .

[26]  D. Lumbroso,et al.  Engaging stakeholders in research to address water–energy–food (WEF) nexus challenges , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[27]  Governance of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: the Conceptual and Methodological Foundations for the San Antonio Region Case Study , 2017 .

[28]  Rabi H. Mohtar,et al.  Water–energy–food (WEF) Nexus Tool 2.0: guiding integrative resource planning and decision-making , 2015 .

[29]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[30]  R. Feiock.  The Institutional Collective Action Framework , 2013 .

[31]  M. Lubell,et al.  Institutional externalities and actor performance in polycentric governance systems , 2018, Environmental Policy and Governance.

[32]  C. Scott,et al.  The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment , 2018 .

[33]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[34]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Structural Theory of Social Influence: List of Tables and Figures , 1998 .

[35]  Jayson Beckman,et al.  Why are Californian Farmers Adopting more (and Larger) Renewable Energy Operations , 2013 .

[36]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Strategic Management of Public and Third Sector Organizations: A Handbook for Leaders , 1992 .

[37]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[38]  R. Hardin,et al.  Collective action as an agreeable N-prisoners''dilemma , 1971 .

[39]  Avner Vengosh,et al.  Water Footprint of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2015 .

[40]  H. Velthuizen,et al.  Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies , 2013 .

[41]  Ann Dale,et al.  Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks , 2007 .

[42]  Weiwei Mo,et al.  The water-energy nexus at water supply and its implications on the integrated water and energy management. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[44]  Nina Hagemann,et al.  Key Issues of Interdisciplinary NEXUS Governance Analyses: Lessons Learned from Research on Integrated Water Resources Management , 2017 .

[45]  Samantha Miles,et al.  Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions , 2017 .

[46]  J. Pittock,et al.  Australian Climate, Energy and Water Policies: conflicts and synergies , 2013 .

[47]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Cross-level linkages in an ecology of climate change adaptation policy games , 2018 .

[48]  M. Winters,et al.  A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[49]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[50]  Ross Maciejewski,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis for the Food-Energy-Water Nexus in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for Nexus Governance , 2017 .

[51]  Zachary P. Neal,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2016 .

[52]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Developing Socio-Techno-Economic-Political (STEP) Solutions for Addressing Resource Nexus Hotspots , 2018 .

[53]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach , 2011 .

[54]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[55]  D. Lazer,et al.  The Network Perspective on Small Groups: Theory and Research , 2005 .

[56]  Rabi H. Mohtar,et al.  Water-Energy-Food Nexus Framework for facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue , 2016 .

[57]  A. Crane,et al.  Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification , 2010 .

[58]  C. Kadushin,et al.  The Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: on social circles in urban life. , 1966, American sociological review.

[59]  Rabi H. Mohtar,et al.  Water, Energy, and Food: The Ultimate Nexus , 2010 .

[60]  B. Crona,et al.  WHAT you know is WHO you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management , 2006 .

[61]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.