Exploring the Treasure of Plant Molecules With Integrated Biorefineries

Despite significant progress toward the commercialization of biobased products, today’s biorefineries are far from achieving their intended goal of total biomass valorization and effective product diversification. The problem is conceptual. Modern biorefineries were built around well-optimized, cost-effective chemical synthesis routes, like those used in petroleum refineries for the synthesis of fuels, plastics, and solvents. However, these were designed for the conversion of fossil resources and are far from optimal for the processing of biomass, which has unique chemical characteristics. Accordingly, existing biomass commodities were never intended for modern biorefineries as they were bred to meet the needs of conventional agriculture. In this perspective paper, we propose a new path toward the design of efficient biorefineries, which capitalizes on a cross-disciplinary synergy between plant, physical, and catalysis science. In our view, the best opportunity to advance profitable and sustainable biorefineries requires the parallel development of novel feedstocks, conversion protocols and synthesis routes specifically tailored for total biomass valorization. Above all, we believe that plant biologists and process technologists can jointly explore the natural diversity of plants to synchronously develop both, biobased crops with designer chemistries and compatible conversion protocols that enable maximal biomass valorization with minimum input utilization. By building biorefineries from the bottom-up (i.e., starting with the crop), the envisioned partnership promises to develop cost-effective, biomass-dedicated routes which can be effectively scaled-up to deliver profitable and resource-use efficient biorefineries.

[1]  Madeleine Bussemaker,et al.  Effect of Ultrasound on Lignocellulosic Biomass as a Pretreatment for Biorefinery and Biofuel Applications , 2013 .

[2]  Abdellatif Barakat,et al.  Eco-friendly dry chemo-mechanical pretreatments of lignocellulosic biomass: Impact on energy and yield of the enzymatic hydrolysis , 2014 .

[3]  P. Gallezot,et al.  Conversion of biomass to selected chemical products. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  M. Himmel,et al.  Deposition of Lignin Droplets Produced During Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Maize Stems Retards Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose , 2007, Biotechnology progress.

[5]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Lignin-polysaccharide interactions in plant secondary cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  B. Dale,et al.  All biomass is local: The cost, volume produced, and global warming impact of cellulosic biofuels depend strongly on logistics and local conditions , 2015 .

[7]  Rodrigo L. Silveira,et al.  Effects of Xylan Side-Chain Substitutions on Xylan-Cellulose Interactions and Implications for Thermal Pretreatment of Cellulosic Biomass. , 2017, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  R. Boom,et al.  Lupine protein enrichment by milling and electrostatic separation , 2016 .

[9]  L. Trindade,et al.  Bioethanol from maize cell walls: genes, molecular tools, and breeding prospects , 2015 .

[10]  M. Himmel,et al.  Charge engineering of cellulases improves ionic liquid tolerance and reduces lignin inhibition , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Rodrigo L. Silveira,et al.  Supramolecular Interactions in Secondary Plant Cell Walls: Effect of Lignin Chemical Composition Revealed with the Molecular Theory of Solvation. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[12]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Engineering a thermoregulated intein-modified xylanase into maize for consolidated lignocellulosic biomass processing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  L. Trindade,et al.  Starch phosphorylation plays an important role in starch biosynthesis. , 2017, Carbohydrate polymers.

[14]  B. Sosinski,et al.  Starch self‐processing in transgenic sweet potato roots expressing a hyperthermophilic α‐amylase , 2011, Biotechnology progress.

[15]  B. Simmons,et al.  Theory, practice and prospects of X-ray and neutron scattering for lignocellulosic biomass characterization: towards understanding biomass pretreatment , 2015 .

[16]  A Tolbert,et al.  Plasticity, elasticity, and adhesion energy of plant cell walls: nanometrology of lignin loss using atomic force microscopy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Zhicheng Shen,et al.  Expression of a bacterial α-amylase gene in transgenic rice seeds , 2008, Transgenic Research.

[18]  C. Wilkerson,et al.  Monolignol Ferulate Transferase Introduces Chemically Labile Linkages into the Lignin Backbone , 2014, Science.

[19]  L. Trindade,et al.  Maize feedstocks with improved digestibility reduce the costs and environmental impacts of biomass pretreatment and saccharification , 2016, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[20]  R. Boom,et al.  Charging and separation behavior of gluten–starch mixtures assessed with a custom-built electrostatic separator , 2015 .

[21]  M. Himmel,et al.  Towards an Understanding of Enhanced Biomass Digestibility by In Planta Expression of a Family 5 Glycoside Hydrolase , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  L. Bülow,et al.  Engineering direct fructose production in processed potato tubers by expressing a bifunctional alpha-amylase/glucose isomerase gene complex. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry , 2011 .

[24]  Peter N. Ciesielski,et al.  Directed plant cell-wall accumulation of iron: embedding co-catalyst for efficient biomass conversion , 2016, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[25]  M. Dusselier,et al.  Top chemical opportunities from carbohydrate biomass: a chemist's view of the Biorefinery. , 2014, Topics in current chemistry.

[26]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Insights into cellulase‐lignin non‐specific binding revealed by computational redesign of the surface of green fluorescent protein , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  L. Trindade,et al.  Heterologous expression of two Arabidopsis starch dikinases in potato , 2017 .

[28]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Analysis of electrostatic powder charging for fractionation of foods , 2014 .

[29]  Christos T. Maravelias,et al.  Nonenzymatic Sugar Production from Biomass Using Biomass-Derived γ-Valerolactone , 2014, Science.

[30]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Concepts for further sustainable production of foods , 2016 .

[31]  Christopher W. Johnson,et al.  Lignin valorization through integrated biological funneling and chemical catalysis , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Remko M. Boom,et al.  Maximum fossil fuel feedstock replacement potential of petrochemicals via biorefineries , 2009 .

[33]  A. Vaidya,et al.  Visualising recalcitrance by colocalisation of cellulase, lignin and cellulose in pretreated pine biomass using fluorescence microscopy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[34]  J. Ralph,et al.  An Engineered Monolignol 4-O-Methyltransferase Depresses Lignin Biosynthesis and Confers Novel Metabolic Capability in Arabidopsis[C][W][OA] , 2012, Plant Cell.

[35]  A. Azapagic Sustainability considerations for integrated biorefineries. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[36]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries , 2007 .

[37]  L. Trindade,et al.  Starch Modification by Biotechnology: State of Art and Perspectives , 2014 .

[38]  Thomas J. Simmons,et al.  Folding of xylan onto cellulose fibrils in plant cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR , 2016, Nature Communications.

[39]  Charles E Wyman,et al.  What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[40]  Jian Shi,et al.  Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production , 2014, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[41]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[42]  Jianguo Li,et al.  Integrated microwave and alkaline treatment for the separation between hemicelluloses and cellulose from cellulosic fibers. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[43]  Jian Shi,et al.  Understanding pretreatment efficacy of four cholinium and imidazolium ionic liquids by chemistry and computation , 2014 .

[44]  L. Trindade,et al.  Engineering Potato Starch with a Higher Phosphate Content , 2017, PloS one.

[45]  A. Blennow,et al.  The future of starch bioengineering: GM microorganisms or GM plants? , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[46]  Jian Shi,et al.  Efficient biomass pretreatment using ionic liquids derived from lignin and hemicellulose , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  A. Blennow,et al.  Hyperphosphorylation of cereal starch , 2011 .

[48]  N. Carpita,et al.  Biomass recalcitrance: a multi-scale, multi-factor, and conversion-specific property. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[49]  P. Garofalo,et al.  Application of multi-metric analysis for the evaluation of energy performance and energy use efficiency of sweet sorghum in the bioethanol supply-chain: A fuzzy-based expert system approach , 2018, Applied Energy.

[50]  Pamela A Silver,et al.  Encapsulation as a Strategy for the Design of Biological Compartmentalization. , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Negatively Supercharging Cellulases Render Them Lignin-Resistant , 2017 .

[52]  B. Dale,et al.  Corn Amylase: Improving the Efficiency and Environmental Footprint of Corn to Ethanol through Plant Biotechnology , 2009 .

[53]  Jian Sun,et al.  Transforming biomass conversion with ionic liquids: process intensification and the development of a high-gravity, one-pot process for the production of cellulosic ethanol , 2016, Energy & Environmental Science.