ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGES OF KEPLER OBJECTS OF INTEREST

All transiting planets are at risk of contamination by blends with nearby, unresolved stars. Blends dilute the transit signal, causing the planet to appear smaller than it really is, or produce a false-positive detection when the target star is blended with eclipsing binary stars. This paper reports on high spatial-resolution adaptive optics images of 90 Kepler planetary candidates. Companion stars are detected as close as 0ˮ1 from the target star. Images were taken in the near-infrared (J and Ks bands) with ARIES on the MMT and PHARO on the Palomar Hale 200 inch telescope. Most objects (60%) have at least one star within 6" separation and a magnitude difference of 9. Eighteen objects (20%) have at least one companion within 2" of the target star; six companions (7%) are closer than 0ˮ5. Most of these companions were previously unknown, and the associated planetary candidates should receive additional scrutiny. Limits are placed on the presence of additional companions for every system observed, which can be used to validate planets statistically using the BLENDER method. Validation is particularly critical for low-mass, potentially Earth-like worlds, which are not detectable with current-generation radial velocity techniques. High-resolution images are thus a crucial component of any transit follow-up program.

[1]  Jie Li,et al.  Kepler-22b: A 2.4 EARTH-RADIUS PLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A SUN-LIKE STAR , 2011, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  Sara Seager,et al.  THE HIGH ALBEDO OF THE HOT JUPITER KEPLER-7 b , 2011, 1105.5143.

[3]  James Roger P. Angel,et al.  ARIES: Arizona infrared imager and echelle spectrograph , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[4]  Sara Seager,et al.  Two Earth-sized planets orbiting Kepler-20 , 2011, Nature.

[5]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  MODELING KEPLER TRANSIT LIGHT CURVES AS FALSE POSITIVES: REJECTION OF BLEND SCENARIOS FOR KEPLER-9, AND VALIDATION OF KEPLER-9 d, A SUPER-EARTH-SIZE PLANET IN A MULTIPLE SYSTEM , 2010, 1008.4393.

[6]  HAT-P-26b: A LOW-DENSITY NEPTUNE-MASS PLANET TRANSITING A K STAR* , 2010, 1010.1008.

[7]  John Asher Johnson,et al.  ON THE LOW FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES , 2011, 1101.5630.

[8]  K. Kinemuchi,et al.  KEPLER-10 c: A 2.2 EARTH RADIUS TRANSITING PLANET IN A MULTIPLE SYSTEM , 2011, 1105.4647.

[9]  Th. Henning,et al.  Binarity of transit host stars - Implications for planetary parameters , 2009, 0902.2179.

[10]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[11]  Eric E. Bloemhof,et al.  Palomar adaptive optics project: status and performance , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[12]  A. Prsa,et al.  PRE-SPECTROSCOPIC FALSE-POSITIVE ELIMINATION OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES , 2010, 1001.0392.

[13]  Jie Li,et al.  THE KEPLER-19 SYSTEM: A TRANSITING 2.2 R⊕ PLANET AND A SECOND PLANET DETECTED VIA TRANSIT TIMING VARIATIONS , 2011, 1109.1561.

[14]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  KEPLER-21b: A 1.6 REarth PLANET TRANSITING THE BRIGHT OSCILLATING F SUBGIANT STAR HD 179070 , 2011, 1112.2165.

[15]  D. Ciardi,et al.  SPECKLE CAMERA OBSERVATIONS FOR THE NASA KEPLER MISSION FOLLOW-UP PROGRAM , 2011 .

[16]  Bernhard R. Brandl,et al.  PHARO: A Near‐Infrared Camera for the Palomar Adaptive Optics System , 2001 .

[17]  F. Fressin,et al.  KEPLER-14b: A MASSIVE HOT JUPITER TRANSITING AN F STAR IN A CLOSE VISUAL BINARY , 2011, 1106.5510.