Non-isotropic Gaussian smoothing and leakage reduction for determining mass changes over land and ocean using GRACE data

SUMMARY We present a new non-isotropic Gaussian filter for smoothing mass changes computed from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) L2 products and a new method to reduce land–ocean signal leakage caused by Gaussian smoothing. The kernel of our non-isotropic filter is the product of two Gaussian functions with distinct latitudinal and longitudinal smoothing radii. When expressed as number of kilometres at the Earth’s surface, the longitudinal smoothing radius, defined as a fixed longitude interval, is longer at the equator, and shorter at higher latitude. This is principally in accordance with the resolution of the GRACE data, and permits us to produce homogeneously smoothed results without excessive smoothing in latitudinal direction. This filter is not applicable in polar regions, where we choose to use the classical isotropic Gaussian filter. A smoothing radius choice scheme is proposed for the two filters to mesh seamlessly. In our leakage reduction method, the inputs are the mass change data after smoothing using a Gaussian filter. Along coasts where mass change signal on land is far larger than that over ocean (or signal over ocean is reduced to a very small magnitude by removing a model beforehand, and adding the model back afterwards), our method approximately recovers a smoothed mass change signal over both land and ocean sides as if a regional Gaussian filter with the same smoothing radius were applied over land and ocean separately, in which no signal leakages appear. The side lobe problem does not appear in our approach. Our leakage reduction method could also be used to study mass changes within a region where signal is far larger than that in surrounding regions, or where signal in surrounding regions could be reduced to very low magnitude by removing a model.

[1]  C. Jekeli Alternative methods to smooth the Earth's gravity field , 1981 .

[2]  T. A. Zang,et al.  Spectral methods for fluid dynamics , 1987 .

[3]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[4]  S. Swenson,et al.  Methods for inferring regional surface‐mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time‐variable gravity , 2002 .

[5]  Yuebing Li,et al.  Green's function of the deformation of the Earth as a result of atmospheric loading , 2004 .

[6]  Clark R. Wilson,et al.  Simulated estimation of hydrological loads from GRACE , 2005 .

[7]  C. Shum,et al.  Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement , 2005 .

[8]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) time‐variable gravity observations , 2005 .

[9]  J. Wahr,et al.  Measurements of Time-Variable Gravity Show Mass Loss in Antarctica , 2006, Science.

[10]  D. Chambers Evaluation of new GRACE time‐variable gravity data over the ocean , 2006 .

[11]  L. Fenoglio-Marc,et al.  Mass variation in the Mediterranean Sea from GRACE and its validation by altimetry, steric and hydrologic fields , 2006 .

[12]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[13]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  Regional gravity modeling in terms of spherical base functions , 2006 .

[14]  B. D. Tapley,et al.  Satellite Gravity Measurements Confirm Accelerated Melting of Greenland Ice Sheet , 2006, Science.

[15]  Willi Freeden,et al.  Wavelet Modeling of Regional and Temporal Variations of the Earth’s Gravitational Potential Observed by GRACE , 2006 .

[16]  J. Kusche Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[17]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Attenuation effect on seasonal basin-scale water storage changes from GRACE time-variable gravity , 2007 .

[18]  Ernst J. O. Schrama,et al.  Signal and noise in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observed surface mass variations , 2007 .

[19]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  GRACE detects coseismic and postseismic deformation from the Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2007 .

[20]  E. Schrama,et al.  Improved accuracy of GRACE gravity solutions through empirical orthogonal function filtering of spherical harmonics , 2007 .

[21]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  A statistical filtering approach for Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity data , 2008 .

[22]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models , 2008 .

[23]  M. Zhong,et al.  Improved inverse and probabilistic methods for geophysical applications of GRACE gravity data , 2009 .

[24]  Oliver Baur,et al.  GRACE‐derived ice‐mass variations over Greenland by accounting for leakage effects , 2009 .

[25]  C. K. Shum,et al.  Application of the cos-Fourier expansion to data transformation between different latitude-longitude grids , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[26]  C. Shum,et al.  On the postprocessing removal of correlated errors in GRACE temporal gravity field solutions , 2009 .

[27]  Faisal Hossain,et al.  Inter-annual Water Storage Changes in Asia from GRACE Data , 2010 .