Metadatapedia: a proposal for aggregating metadata on data archiving

The open access movement has highlighted the barriers that exist for users to gain access to significant portions of the research literature. The open data approach seeks to extend the principles of open access to the data and code that supports the published scholarly record. Current metadata is inadequate to allow information researchers to evaluate claims made about data archiving practices. Assessing current archiving practice and understanding the impact of archiving policies requires improved metadata. We propose that information researchers create an infrastructure for the collection of metadata about data use in the research literature, and that infrastructure should itself be open. The availability of metadata on data use would enable the calculation of archiving indices, just as citation data enables the calculation of the h-index.

[1]  S. Goodman,et al.  Reproducible Research: Moving toward Research the Public Can Really Trust , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Leslie M. Delserone At the Watershed: Preparing for Research Data Management and Stewardship at the University of Minnesota Libraries , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[3]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[4]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Lisa A. Ennis The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  J. Willinsky The access principle: The case for open access to research , 2005 .

[7]  Jingfeng Xia,et al.  Assessment of Self-archiving in Institutional Repositories: Across Disciplines , 2007 .

[8]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  W. Greene,et al.  The role of data/code archives in the future of economic research , 2008 .

[10]  Randy Goebel,et al.  DBconnect: mining research community on DBLP data , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[11]  A. P. deVries,et al.  How Crowdsourcable is Your Task , 2011 .

[12]  Mark John Costello Motivating Online Publication of Data , 2009 .

[13]  A. Vickers,et al.  Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals , 2009, PloS one.

[14]  Matthijs den Besten,et al.  Open science in e-science: contingency or policy? , 2009, J. Documentation.

[15]  Victoria Stodden,et al.  Open science: Policy implications for the evolving phenomenon of user-led scientific innovation , 2010 .

[16]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[17]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Retracted Science and the Retraction Index , 2011, Infection and Immunity.

[18]  Thomas Krichel,et al.  The Economics of Open Bibliographic Data Provision , 2009 .

[19]  Jeremy Freese,et al.  Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science , 2007 .

[20]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..