Maximum energy conversion from human motion using piezoelectric flex transducer: A multi-level surrogate modeling strategy

Conventional engineering design optimization requires a large amount of expensive experimental tests from prototypes or computer simulations, which may result in an inefficient and unaffordable design process. In order to overcome these disadvantages, a surrogate model may be used to replace the prototype tests. To construct a surrogate model of sufficient accuracy from limited number of tests/simulations, a multi-level surrogate modeling strategy is introduced in this article. First, a chosen number of points determined by optimal Latin Hypercube Design of Experiments are used to generate global-level surrogate models with genetic programming and the fitness landscape can be explored by genetic algorithms for near-optimal solutions. Local-level surrogate models are constructed then from the extended-optimal Latin Hypercube samples in the vicinity of global optimum on the basis of a much smaller number of chosen points. As a result, an improved optimal design is achieved. The efficiency of this strategy is demonstrated by the parametric optimization design of a piezoelectric flex transducer energy harvester. The optimal design is verified by finite element simulations and the results show that the proposed multi-level surrogate modeling strategy has the advantages of faster convergence and more efficiency in comparison with the conventional single-single level surrogate modeling technique.

[1]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[2]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  A Field Guide to Genetic Programming , 2008 .

[3]  Zhao Jing,et al.  A cooperative radial basis function method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling , 2017 .

[4]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[5]  Hazem Hassan,et al.  Design and Implementation of Thin-filmed Piezoelectric Pressure Sensor , 2012 .

[6]  Jean-Luc Marcelin A metamodel using neural networks and genetic algorithms for an integrated optimal design of mechanisms , 2004 .

[7]  Umberto Armani,et al.  Development of a hybrid genetic programming technique for computationally expensive optimisation problems , 2014 .

[8]  Jari Juuti,et al.  Combined electrical and electromechanical simulations of a piezoelectric cymbal harvester for energy harvesting from walking , 2014 .

[9]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  A multi-fidelity surrogate-model-assisted evolutionary algorithm for computationally expensive optimization problems , 2016, J. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Saeed Behbahani,et al.  Multi-objective shape design optimization of piezoelectric energy harvester using artificial immune system , 2016 .

[11]  Layne T. Watson,et al.  Efficient global optimization algorithm assisted by multiple surrogate techniques , 2012, Journal of Global Optimization.

[12]  Alexander I. J. Forrester,et al.  Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Seong Kwang Hong,et al.  Design Optimization of PZT-Based Piezoelectric Cantilever Beam by Using Computational Experiments , 2016, Journal of Electronic Materials.

[14]  Nesbitt W. Hagood,et al.  Modelling of Piezoelectric Actuator Dynamics for Active Structural Control , 1990 .

[15]  Jianqiao Ye,et al.  Metamodel-assisted design optimization of piezoelectric flex transducer for maximal bio-kinetic energy conversion , 2017 .

[16]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Estimation of Electric Charge Output for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting , 2004 .

[17]  E. S. Siah,et al.  Fast parameter optimization of large-scale electromagnetic objects using DIRECT with Kriging metamodeling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[18]  Zhi Yan Modeling of a piezoelectric/piezomagnetic nano energy harvester based on two dimensional theory , 2017 .

[19]  Loris Vincenzi,et al.  A proper infill sampling strategy for improving the speed performance of a Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm , 2017 .

[20]  J. Box R.A. Fisher and the Design of Experiments, 1922–1926 , 1980 .

[21]  Meiling Zhu,et al.  Analyses of power output of piezoelectric energy-harvesting devices directly connected to a load resistor using a coupled piezoelectric-circuit finite element method , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Saeed Badshah,et al.  Vibration Analysis of an Ocean Current Turbine Blade , 2012 .

[23]  Abdus Samad,et al.  Torque and efficiency maximization for a wave energy harvesting turbine: an approach to modify multiple design variables , 2017 .

[24]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[25]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Multi-fidelity optimization for sheet metal forming process , 2011 .

[26]  J. Zhang,et al.  Cymbal transducers: a review , 2000, ISAF 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 12th IEEE International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37076).

[27]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[28]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  Design, analysis and testing of a piezoelectric flex transducer for harvesting bio-kinetic energy , 2013 .

[29]  B. Youn,et al.  Time-varying output performances of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting under nonstationary random vibrations , 2017 .