Analysis of Competitiveness in the NBA Regular Seasons

Research background and hypothesis. Several attempts have been made to understand some modalities of sport from the point of view of complexity. Most of these studies deal with this phenomenon with regard to the mechanics of the game itself (in isolation). Nevertheless, some research has been conducted from the perspective of competition between teams. Our hypothesis was that for the study of competitiveness levels in the system of league competition our analysis model (Shannon entropy), is a useful and highly sensitive tool to determine the degree of global competitiveness of a league.Research aim. The aim of our study was to develop a model for the analysis of competitiveness level in team sport competitions based on the uncertainty level that might exist for each confrontation.Research methods. Degree of uncertainty or randomness of the competition was analyzed as a factor of competitiveness. It was calculated on the basis of the Shannon entropy.Research results. We studied 17 NBA regular seasons, which showed a fairly steady entropic tendency. There were seasons less competitive (≤ 0.9800) than the overall average (0.9835), and periods where the competitiveness remained at higher levels (range: 0.9851 to 0.9902).Discussion and conclusions. A league is more competitive when it is more random. Thus, it is harder to predict the fi nal outcome. However, when the competition is less random, the degree of competitiveness will decrease signifi cantly. The NBA is a very competitive league, there is a high degree of uncertainty of knowing the fi nal result.Keywords: complex systems, basketball, entropy, competition, randomness.

[1]  Brian C. Goodwin,et al.  How the Leopard Changed Its Spots , 1995 .

[2]  I. Franks,et al.  System approach to games and competitive playing: Reply to Lebed (2006) , 2007 .

[3]  Keith Davids,et al.  Power law distributions in pattern dynamics of attacker-defender dyads in the team sport of Rugby Union : phenomena in a region of self-organized criticality? , 2009 .

[4]  L. Goddard Information Theory , 1962, Nature.

[5]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  Rodney Fort,et al.  “Competitive Balance in Sports Leagues: An Introduction” , 2003 .

[7]  Kelly Goossens,et al.  Competitive Balance in European Football - Comparison by Adapting Measures: National Measure of Seasonal Imbalance and Top 3 , 2006 .

[8]  Felix Lebed,et al.  System approach to games and competitive playing , 2006 .

[9]  R. N. Onody,et al.  Complex network study of Brazilian soccer players. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Julio M. Ottino,et al.  Complex networks , 2004, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[11]  S. Picoli,et al.  A random walk approach modeling soccer leagues , 2010 .

[12]  R. S. Mendes,et al.  Statistics of football dynamics , 2007, 0706.1758.

[13]  David J. Berri,et al.  Competitive Balance and Attendance , 2001 .

[14]  Sangit Chatterjee,et al.  The NBA as an Evolving Multivariate System , 1999 .

[15]  Keith Davids,et al.  Information-governing dynamics of attacker–defender interactions in youth rugby union , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  Tamas Vicsek Complexity: The bigger picture , 2002, Nature.

[17]  Sangit Chatterjee,et al.  Patterns of NBA team performance from 1950 to 1998 , 2000 .