Distributed Collaborative Design Teams: Media Effects on Design Processes

Collaborative manufacturing, a growing competitive structure for manufacturing companies and government agencies, is based on flexible design and production processes, with multiple companies pooling strengths on a product-by-product basis to create distributed collaborative corporations. This experimental research uses a sociotechnical theory as a framework to explore differences in engineering design team decision making as a function of various media of communication. Results indicate that design teams communicating via an electronic medium perceive an increase in mental workload and interact less frequently, but for a greater total amount of time. No evidence was found to suggest that face-to-face teams spend a greater proportion of their time discussing design issues or alternatives than do their dispersed counterparts. Realizing that critical decisions throughout design have a tremendous effect on cost, time to production, and overall quality, the study's results lead to broad implications and suggestions for the management of distributed design teams.

[1]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Thunderwire: a field study of an audio-only media space , 1996, CSCW '96.

[2]  G. W. Hill.  Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[3]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[4]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Developmental Processes in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[5]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Cooperative versus Conflictive Problem Solving in Three Telecommunication Modes , 1976 .

[6]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[7]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality. , 1988 .

[8]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[9]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Human Factors in Agile Manufacturing , 1995 .

[10]  Virtual organizations-an opportunity for learning , 1996, IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies.

[11]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  It's all in the words: supporting work activites with lightweight tools , 1999, GROUP '99.

[13]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[14]  David C. Brown,et al.  Design Problem Solving: Knowledge Structures and Control Strategies , 1989 .

[15]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Effects of Workload and Structure on Team Processes and Performance: Implications for Complex Team Decision Making , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Craig M. Harvey,et al.  Toward a model of distributed engineering collaboration , 1998 .

[17]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Concurrent engineering tools: are the human issues being ignored? , 1996 .

[18]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  The Effects of Task and Interpersonal Cohesiveness on Performance of a Disjunctive Group Task1 , 1988 .

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work , 2000, CSCW '00.

[20]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. , 1989 .

[21]  Rick Dove,et al.  21ST Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy. Volume 2. Infrastructure , 1991 .

[22]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Communication and Group Decision-Making , 1986 .

[23]  長町 三生,et al.  Design for manufacturability : a systems approach to concurrent engineering and ergonomics , 1992 .

[24]  George Stephanopoulos,et al.  Knowledge-Based System Applications in Engineering Design: Research at MIT , 1989, AI Mag..

[25]  Erick C. Jones,et al.  Group dynamics of video conferencing , 1996 .

[26]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: effects on outcomes and communication , 1996, CSCW '96.

[27]  Natalie Kupferberg.  Going Virtual , 2002 .

[28]  Craig M. Harvey,et al.  Distributed collaboration for engineering design: A review and reappraisal. , 2001 .

[29]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[30]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Strategies and biases in human decision-making and their implications for expert systems , 1986 .

[31]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  The management of technology within an enterprise engineering framework , 1995 .

[32]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[33]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Geri Gay,et al.  Use of Communication Resources in a Networked Collaborative Design Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  Jane M. Carey,et al.  The Impact of Communication Mode and Task Complexity on Small Group Performance and Member Satisfaction. , 1997 .

[36]  Nancy J. Evans,et al.  The Group Attitude Scale , 1986 .

[37]  B. M. Kleiner,et al.  Identifying critical factors impacting virtual work group performance , 1996, IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies.

[38]  Wendy Samter,et al.  DECISION‐MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITY , 1984 .