Toward a Group Facilitation Technique for Project Teams

This article presents the development of a group facilitation technique (PROMOD — Procedural Moderation). The author points toward the importance of integrating theoretical assumptions, theory testing and basic empirical research with practical application. The results are based on the observation of various three-member task groups faced with a complex non-heureka problem. These comprise naturally interacting groups, simple arithmetic assembled groups of individuals without any interaction (synthetic groups), and groups in which a group technique of reduced interaction which focuses on individual contribution through facilitated knowledge elicitation is applied.The task involves decisions on what to do after a plane crash and ranking objects with regard to their importance for survival in an alarming situation (Lafferty & Pond, 1974). The group decision quality is determined by relating to conclusions reached by an independent expert. Results indicate that the observed teams performed best when the PROMOD procedure was applied.

[1]  A. Hollingshead.  The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[2]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  Judgmental competence of individuals and groups in a dichotomous choice situation: Is a majority of heads better than one? , 1978 .

[4]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  Samuel Shiflett,et al.  Toward a general model of small group productivity. , 1979 .

[6]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  E. Ramsden.  Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[8]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Knowledge of partner's ability as a moderator of group motivation gains: an exploration of the Köhler discrepancy effect. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[10]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  The Stepladder Technique: An Alternative Group Structure Facilitating Effective Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[11]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? , 2003 .

[12]  M Estryn-Behar,et al.  [Encounter groups]. , 1990, Servir.

[13]  Ichiro Innami.  The Quality of Group Decisions, Group Verbal Behavior, and Intervention , 1994 .

[14]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[15]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[16]  Herbert Solomon,et al.  Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems , 1955 .

[17]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups Perform Better than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-numbers Problems: Effects of Group Size Two-letter Substitution Strategy , 2003 .

[18]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Knowledge of partner's ability as a moderator of group motivation gains: an exploration of the Köhler discrepancy effect. , 2002 .

[19]  M. Diehl,et al.  Why Groups are less Effective than their Members: On Productivity Losses in Idea-generating Groups , 1994 .

[20]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  Member Variation, Recognition of Expertise, and Group Performance , 1987 .

[21]  N. Shadbolt,et al.  Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis , 1995 .

[22]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples 1950-1990 , 1992 .

[24]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[25]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Gary Katzenstein,et al.  The Debate on Structured Debate: Toward a Unified Theory , 1996 .

[27]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .