On moment closures for population dynamics in continuous space.

A first-order moment closure, the mean-field assumption that organisms encounter one another in proportion to their spatial average densities, lies at the heart of much theoretical ecology. This assumption ignores all spatial information and, at the very least, needs to be replaced by a second-order closure to gain understanding of ecological dynamics in spatially structured populations. We describe a number of conditions that a second-order closure should satisfy and use these conditions to evaluate some closures currently available in the literature. Two conditions are particularly helpful in discriminating among the alternatives: that the closure should be positive, and that the dynamics should be unaltered when identical individuals are given different labels. On this basis, a class of closures we refer to as 'power-2' turns out to provide a good compromise between positivity and dynamical invariance under relabelling.

[1]  R. Law,et al.  Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors , 2002 .

[2]  M J Keeling,et al.  Multiplicative moments and measures of persistence in ecology. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[4]  J. Kirkwood.  Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .

[5]  David A. Rand,et al.  Correlation Equations and Pair Approximations for Spatial Ecologies , 1999 .

[6]  S. Ellner,et al.  Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  P. Burrough.  Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology: Spatial aspects of ecological data , 1995 .

[8]  Peter Stoll,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC AGGREGATION ALTERS COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2001 .

[9]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Jacqueline McGlade,et al.  Advanced Ecological Theory , 1999 .

[11]  Bai-Lian Li,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2002 .

[12]  R. Pearl,et al.  On the Rate of Growth of the Population of the United States since 1790 and Its Mathematical Representation. , 1920, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. Arditi,et al.  Nonlinear Food Web Models and Their Responses to Increased Basal Productivity , 1996 .

[14]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest , 2001, Ecological Research.

[15]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  POPULATION GROWTH IN SPACE AND TIME: SPATIAL LOGISTIC EQUATIONS , 2003 .

[16]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: I. Crop growth and yield , 2001, Weed Science.

[17]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Pathogen invasion and host extinction in lattice structured populations , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology , 2004 .

[19]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[20]  E. Hill.  Journal of Theoretical Biology , 1961, Nature.

[21]  J A N Filipe,et al.  Analytical methods for predicting the behaviour of population models with general spatial interactions. , 2003, Mathematical biosciences.

[22]  J. Mcglade,et al.  Advanced ecological theory : principles and applications , 1999 .

[23]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population , 1992 .

[24]  D. Thouless,et al.  Models of Disorder: The Theoretical Physics of Homogeneously Disordered Systems , 1979 .

[25]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Pair Approximations for Lattice-based Ecological Models , 2000 .

[26]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Moment Approximations of Individual-based Models , 1999 .

[27]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Relaxation Projections and the Method of Moments , 1999 .

[28]  W. Godwin.  Article in Press , 2000 .

[29]  Minus van Baalen,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Pair Approximations for Different Spatial Geometries , 2000 .

[30]  A. Sasaki,et al.  ‘Small worlds’ and the evolution of virulence: infection occurs locally and at a distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  A DYNAMICAL SYSTEM FOR NEIGHBORHOODS INPLANT COMMUNITIES , 2000 .

[32]  G. J. Gibson,et al.  Comparing approximations to spatio-temporal models for epidemics with local spread , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[33]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[34]  Richard Law,et al.  Beetles in fragmented woodlands: a formal framework for dynamics of movement in ecological landscapes , 2000 .

[35]  B M Bolker,et al.  Analytic models for the patchy spread of plant disease , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[36]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Population persistence and spatially limited social interaction. , 1995, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  G. Polis,et al.  Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics , 1997 .

[38]  B. Bolker,et al.  Using Moment Equations to Understand Stochastically Driven Spatial Pattern Formation in Ecological Systems , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[39]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Moment Methods for Ecological Processes in Continuous Space , 2000 .

[40]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population: The Lattice Lotka-Volterra Model , 1992 .

[41]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species , 1997 .

[42]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: II. Barnyardgrass growth and seed production , 2001, Weed Science.