Kinematic implications of learned non-use for robotic therapy

Learned non-use (LNU) may be a measure of carry-over and a potential measure for determining the efficacy of robot-based training for stroke rehabilitation. Identifying sensitive and reliable measures for detecting LNU would help evaluate whether robot training consistently reduced both motor impairment and functional disability after stroke-induced hemiplegia. We report on investigations into the relationship between LNU and four kinematic metrics commonly used to characterize impaired arm movements in Cartesian space during functional reaching. Results indicate that movement time, peak velocity, total displacement and movement smoothness accounted for less that 17% of the variability in LNU scores. A metric, derived from changes in impaired arm kinematic scores between unilateral and bilateral functional reaches, did not improve the prediction of LNU. Objectively quantifying LNU may require kinetic and kinematic metrics that measure proximal and distal sensory and motor impairment.

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation. , 2003, Advances in neurology.

[2]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: New approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. , 1999 .

[4]  E A Bullock,et al.  Post-stroke rehabilitation. , 1975, Royal Society of Health journal.

[5]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Harris,et al.  An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Annette Sterr,et al.  Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  C B Walter,et al.  Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Catherine Ann Kernich,et al.  Post Stroke Rehabilitation, Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 16 , 1996 .