What is this thing called frequency?

When researchers are interested in the influence of long-term knowledge on performance, printed word frequency is typically the variable of choice. Despite this preference, we know little about what frequency norms measure. They ostensibly index how often and how recently words are experienced, but words appear in context, so frequency potentially reflects an influence of connections with other words. This paper presents the results of a large free association study as well as the results of experiments designed to evaluate the hypothesis that common words have stronger connectionsto other words. The norms indicate that common words tend to be more concrete but they do not appear to have more associates, stronger associates, or more connections among their associates. Two extralist cued recall experiments showed that, with other attributes being equal, high- and low-frequency words were equally effective as test cues. These results suggest that frequency does not achieve its effects because of stronger or greater numbers of connectionsto other words, as implied in SAM. Other results indicated that common words have more connectionsfrom other words, including their associates, and that free association provides a valid index of associative strength.

[1]  C. Noble.  An analysis of meaning. , 1952, Psychological review.

[2]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[3]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  J. Cañas,et al.  Associative Strength Effects in the Lexical Decision Task , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  E. Tulving.  Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. , 1976 .

[6]  D. Johnson.  Word-association and word-frequency. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Rudolph W. Schulz,et al.  Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns , 1966 .

[8]  D L Nelson,et al.  Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: Set size and word-frequency effects , 1995, Psychological research.

[9]  D C Rubin,et al.  Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[10]  H L Roediger,et al.  Inhibiting effects of recall , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  D L Nelson,et al.  One step is not enough: Making better use of association norms to predict cued recall , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall , 1992 .

[14]  H. P. Bahrick.  Two-phase model for prompted recall. , 1970 .

[15]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. , 1998 .

[16]  W. A. Winnick,et al.  TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION THRESHOLDS, PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING, AND FREE RECALL AS A FUNCTION OF ABSTRACTNESS-CONCRETENESS AND WORD FREQUENCY. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  G. Bower,et al.  A propositional theory of recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[18]  John Brown,et al.  Recall and Recognition , 1976 .

[19]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  Word-association as a function of word-frequency. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[21]  Harry Levi Hollingworth,et al.  Characteristic differences between recall and recognition. , 1913 .

[22]  D. Howes,et al.  On the relation between the probability of a word as an association and in general linguistic usage. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[23]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Processing implicit and explicit representations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[24]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Encoding context and set size. , 1979 .

[25]  V. Gregg.  Word frequency, recognition and recall. , 1976 .

[26]  D L Nelson,et al.  Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  B. Underwood,et al.  Meaningfulness and verbal learning , 1960 .

[28]  J. Hayes,et al.  Writing Research and the Writer. , 1986 .

[29]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[30]  W. F. Battig,et al.  Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .

[31]  E. Saltz.  Thorndike-Lorge frequency and m of stimuli as separate factors in paired-associates learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  L. Postman.  THE CALIFORNIA NORMS: ASSOCIATION AS A FUNCTION OF WORD FREQUENCY , 1970 .