Analysis of SI Combustion Diagnostics Methods Using Ion-Current Sensing Techniques

Closed-loop electronic control is a proven and efficient way to optimize spark ignition engine performance and to control pollutant emissions. In-cylinder pressure sensors provide accurate information on the quality of combustion. The conductivity of combustion flames can alternatively be used as a measure of combustion quality through ion-current measurements. In this paper, combustion diagnostics through ion-current sensing are studied. A single cylinder research engine was used to investigate the effects of misfire, ignition timing, air to fuel ratio, compression ratio, speed and load on the ion- current signal. The ion-current signal was obtained via one, or both, of two additional, remote in-cylinder ion sensors (rather than by via the firing spark plug, as is usually the case). The ion-current signals obtained from a single remote sensor, and then the two remote sensors are compared. Ion-current signal interpretation was then conducted using an artificial neural network strategy (using adaptive linear networks) to interpret the measured signals, and also to predict the associated cylinder pressures. The combination of remote sensors with a linear neural network gives a more accurate and ‘noise’ free signal that can be processed at greater speed through computationally inexpensive methods. The computed results agree well with measured cylinder pressures under all analyzed conditions. It will be shown that ion-current signals can be used to directly diagnose combustion abnormalities (and as such could suitable as part of a closed loop control strategy), even though the effects of ignition timing, air to fuel ratio, and compression ratio on ion-current were more complex.

[1]  M. Glavmo,et al.  Closed Loop Start of Combustion Control Utilizing Ionization Sensing in a Diesel Engine , 1999 .

[2]  Pascal Higelin,et al.  Limitations of Ionization Current Sensors and Comparison with Cylinder Pressure Sensors , 2000 .

[3]  Magnus Hellring,et al.  Robust AFR estimation using the ion current and neural networks , 1999 .

[4]  Stefan Byttner,et al.  Strategies for handling the fuel additive problem in neural network based ion current interpretation , 2001 .

[5]  Chao F. Daniels,et al.  The Comparison of Mass Fraction Burned Obtained from the Cylinder Pressure Signal and Spark Plug Ion Signal , 1998 .

[7]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[8]  Yutaka Ohashi,et al.  The Application of Ionic Current Detection System for the Combustion Condition Control , 1998 .

[9]  Uwe Kiencke,et al.  Automotive Control Systems , 2005 .

[10]  U. Holmberg,et al.  A Comparison of Ion Current Based Algorithms for Peak Pressure Position Control , 2001 .

[11]  Magnus Hellring,et al.  Spark Advance Control Using the Ion Current and Neural Soft Sensors , 1999 .

[12]  Fabian Mauss,et al.  IN-CYLINDER PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS USING THE SPARK PLUG AS AN IONIZATION SENSOR , 1997 .

[13]  Stephen George Russ,et al.  Measurements of the Effect of In-Cylinder Motion on Flame Development and Cycle-to-Cycle Variations Using an Ionization Probe Head Gasket , 1997 .

[14]  Thorsteinn S. Rögnvaldsson,et al.  Ion Current Based Pressure Peak Detection Under Different Air Humidity Conditions , 2000 .

[15]  Gerard W. Malaczynski,et al.  Real-Time Digital Signal Processing of Ionization Current for Engine Diagnostic and Control , 2003 .

[16]  Jürgen Förster,et al.  Ion Current Sensing for Spark Ignition Engines , 1999 .

[17]  Jan Nytomt,et al.  Ion-Gap Sense in Misfire Detection, Knock and Engine Control , 1995 .

[18]  Lars Eriksson,et al.  An ion-sense engine fine-tuner , 1998 .

[19]  Lars Eriksson,et al.  Closed Loop Ignition Control by Ionization Current Interpretation , 1997 .